5 Comments
тна Return to thread

All those things did happen during Biden's single term, but was he the decision-maker? I'm not trying to make excuses for him, but it seems more likely that they were concocted by an unidentified bunch of radical but stupid opportunists who used FJB as their sem i-conscious puppet.

And O, the irony -- when all was said and dune they got Trumped.

Expand full comment

I tend to agree with you. We may never know how much of a patsy Biden was. Many of Obama's goons moved to the Biden administration and must of had some influence. I really wonder if any of the pardons Biden signed were by his direction? Speaker Johnson's conversation with Biden, as he explained it, made it obvious that Biden was not aware of his own policy decisions. His handlers failed, if they made any effort at all, to inform him of what he was signing. Perhaps they actually deceived him. Ultimately they betrayed him.

Expand full comment

To what extent they betrayed him is unclear, due to the things we don't know.

One part unknown is how aware he was of what was going on 4 years ago, when he came to office. What we can be sure of is that whatever diminished state he was in then, it got worse during his 4 years.

Another unknown is the extent to which Biden agreed with those who spoke for him, and/or the extent to which he was conscious of what was going on.

One thing we know for sure: the backroom, gang betrayed us, by faking the existence of a fully functional, responsible president.

And THAT ought to be a crime.

Expand full comment

It is a crime-- called treason.

Expand full comment

Possibly, although the now-departed WH crowd might call it informed deliberations, or some such thing. What I DO know is that facilitating an invasion does amount to treason -- it's in the Constitution.

Expand full comment