108 Comments

This is the group of people we need to jail first: the transgender enablers.

Expand full comment
founding

I agree, but in my view, the enablers are the health systems and physicians who salivate over the procedure for their big money payouts. The medical industrial complex has become bigger than the military industrial complex because healthcare doesn't come and go like wars do.

Between Tranny surgeries and what we saw rollout with COVID, there should be a healthcare shortage in a few years since most of the health system executive teams and the physicians who blindly followed their orders will be incarcerated.

This medical industrial complex is no different than the NAZI Germany regime.

Expand full comment

They have sold their souls for the money that this terrible policy allows today.

Expand full comment

The so called health care system has nothing to do with either our personal health or our care.

Expand full comment
founding

But, Joseph, If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor.

Expand full comment
founding

You have quoted the Kenyan, word-for-word! I expect your tongue was firmly in your cheek? :) That smilie was for the Hippocritic Oath, BHO took with his manicured nails firmly behind his back.

Expand full comment

I don’t think that removing the pedodocs and the execs will destroy the system. In fact, it probably would return the system to caring for patients and solving issues rather than treating symptoms.

Expand full comment
founding

Jail and class action lawsuits to bankrupt them like the evil done by the Catholic Church and sheltering paedophile priests.

Expand full comment

I agree and understand, but it ain't working.

Expand full comment

Especially the ones mutilating children.

Expand full comment

It's turning out to be one of the issues hurting the Dem party so I'm a little ambivalent. Most people who care to be informed are against it. Mom's are mostly against it except for the Karens on the coasts. Dems don't have any policies that Americans will support so it's always I'm not Donald Trump. It ain't working.

Expand full comment
6 hrs agoLiked by Don Surber

We gave women unfettered access to vote. Their response was that the ability to kill their own children was top priority.

Expand full comment
founding

We also gave them unfettered access to birth control. I’m not a woman, but it seems to me it would be a lot easier to take a pill than have an abortion.

Expand full comment
founding
6 hrs ago·edited 4 hrs ago

Logic evades their thinking which is why they work so hard to call abortion "healthcare" when it is really birth control for the clueless and lazy who project their failures on the productive people in society. There are a very few instances in the need to abort a pregnancy, and it doesn't justify the unbridled access women fight for.

Expand full comment
founding

Thank your teacher's union and the media for that newspeak. Also, some clergy.

Expand full comment

That requires personal responsibility and we all know the lefts thoughts on that one.

Expand full comment

With the availability of all kinds of cheap birth control that was NOT available pre 1960, why would anyone want to put themselves through a medical procedure which is not without possible side effects or even ability to have children? It just makes NO sense whatsoever EXCEPT this is a nation of stupid sheeple of both sexes. There is NO, none, reverence for life anymore. Witness random killings we now hear about!!!

Expand full comment

Birth control is not only cheap - a lot those needing prescriptions became free under 0bamascare. Anyone notice that your insurance premiums have gone up?

Expand full comment

nothing is free....

Expand full comment

I am a woman and I thank God that I never had to be confronted with the terrible decision whether or not to have an abortion. I am also thankful for "the pill"

Expand full comment

Tough subject but when we have women deciding elections by their emotional connection to killing babies and mean Tweets was the 19th really a good idea?

Expand full comment

I've got two conservative daughters that are a hell of a lot smarter than me. I can't imagine not letting them to vote. However, there a lot of stupid males that should be frozen out of the election process. Male actors like DeNiro come to mind.

Expand full comment
founding

Spot on Jake !

Expand full comment
founding

I can see your point, but the same can be said about extending the vote to men without property; their idea of progress will be to take it from those who have it -- by means of their Leftist representatives. One example of those: Kamala cackling about making them pay "their FAIR SHARE".

Expand full comment

This comment is tragically true for a certain segment of women - mostly those under 40 and Democrat. A majority of older women , and especially Republican leaning, agree that abortion should either be illegal or restricted beyond 15 weeks gestation. My motto as a volunteer in the pro-life movement is that I don’t care so much for changing laws as I care for changing women’s hearts.

Expand full comment

problem is....it's the younger women who kill their unborn children, not the older ones. mothers and k-12 have destroyed almost 70,000,000 lives and all those who would come after. what going forward? we haven't even gotten our first female abortion loving president yet.

Expand full comment

I don't understand the 15 week bull shit, what is right is right and what is wrong is wrong, if you really extrapolate the time to abort the life could be anywhere from 15 weeks to end of the natural life....

Expand full comment

My single mother(warrior) raising two of us boys in the 70's told me she wanted the 19th amendment repealed after Carter got elected... I was 8 at the time and had to look it up; it wasn't until much later that I understood her.

Expand full comment
founding

Carter was bad, but so bad that Reagan came in on a landslide, which was great. The only trouble was, Reagan had no worthy successor, but I believe Trump does.

Expand full comment

I think he does too: if he doesn't turn out to be like Reagan's.

Expand full comment
founding

I'm quite convinced that Vance is superior to any of the Bushes, in education, intelligence and steadfastness.

Expand full comment

Don’t get me started

Expand full comment

So sad, so true.

Expand full comment
6 hrs agoLiked by Don Surber

This sketch - which I would remain blissfully unaware of but for Don’s dragging the left’s “culture” into the harsh morning light - would be startling but for one thing: it reinforces the observation that leftists are absolutely incapable of self-awareness. So the modern day horrors of the T Boys movement and the irony of this sketch is completely lost on them.

Expand full comment
founding

I think that’s exactly right.

Expand full comment
6 hrs agoLiked by Don Surber

So sitting here enjoying my coffee, a bit of breakfast and reading Don. Then he has to mention Rachel Levine whereas I abruptly spit out my coffee and breakfast with the mere thought of her/he/it. Good God what a disgrace.

Expand full comment
founding

Not that there’s a reason, but has anyone seen Levine and Milley together? I’m thinking it’s the same homosapien.

Expand full comment

Come to think of it, they deserve to be together. In a rubber room.

Expand full comment

Yeah, both eunuchs suffering with severe TDS.

Expand full comment
founding

Not only to the military, but to America, who depends on valor, integrity, and profound pride for their protection from all enemies.

Expand full comment
founding
6 hrs agoLiked by Don Surber

"So far, I have not found lefties who were offended by the skit, despite its purpose being about as subtle as a sledgehammer to the head."

What is a sledgehammer to the head of most of society is an unnoticeable tap to Kamala Harris and her devoted followers. Her followers don't seem to mind that she can't answer simple policy questions without uttering mumbled word salad responses that nobody understands. In other words, the followers of Kamala Harris don't want to understand anything really. Her "Let me be clear" opening to her interview questions is her only ability to sound substantive.

When she loses, her career in public service is over and I can't wait to see it happen.

Expand full comment

“Let me be clear”…as she then will go on ad nauseum to thoroughly confuse and befuddle you.

Expand full comment

Cringe Jean Pierre does the same thing. They must teach it at woke universities.

Expand full comment
founding

Maybe Jean Pierre is really Kamala with a wig and blackface...?

Expand full comment

She does utilize a lot of filler words to increase those word salads!

Expand full comment
6 hrs agoLiked by Don Surber

This is such an hideous topic to try and be rational about. Right up there with human and sexual trafficking it’s a mortal sin against a single human or many humans to castrate someone - either boy or girl - and thereby make them sterile among other harms. And here I thought that castration for the purpose of either making the harem secure or retaining a boy’s voice was illegal - and as noted also banned by His Eminence Pope Leo. Now it’s a medical treatment?

I don’t know how to express my whole (quite angry) dumbfoundedness that it’s a form of being polite to endorse another’s self mutilation or the mutilation of their child.

Expand full comment

The fact that such an insane practice is allowed for anyone, even an adult, only proves that practitioners are as insane as their patients.

But to even contemplate encouraging and condoning it for children is beyond the pale.

No punishment will ever be adequate enough for these demons.

Expand full comment
founding

Wherever is the { Hippocratic Oath } Suzie ?

Expand full comment
5 hrs agoLiked by Don Surber

I had. An interesting exchange with one of my neighbors recently. He was saying that the SCOTUS decision on. Abortion proved to him that the justices were corrupt. So I asked him if that meant then that the justices who decided roe vs wade were likewise corrupt? He didnt get it. He said no, they were reasonable. Huh? Then I told him that the justices didnt ban abortion, they just said it was a state issue and he told me that was a cop out and they failed to do their jobs. So I have decided these lefty’s either lack a brain or they are so deeply politicized they can’t think for themselves. Or both. Incidentally, my neighbor is a retired doctor. And he see’s no problem with the current transgender policies of our government. These people are sick. Wonder if my retired doctor neighbor would feel the same way if the medical profession had been allowed to “alter his program” when he was a kid?

Expand full comment

Sounds like he envies the current gravy train that his abortionist and “gender affirming” colleagues are on.

Expand full comment

This is all child sacrifice to their deity: Satan.

Expand full comment

I don’t believe that. These people lack the ability to connect or link events or issues to core beliefs. They cannot see the natural progression of an issue from current practice to the core of ones belief system because they dont have one. They believe in nothing but themselves and “what they want”.

Expand full comment

“The difference five centuries later is back then, no one called castrati girls. Society did not pretend that they were suddenly female. They were simply males without, um, their stones. Most of them kept their, um, pillars if only for urination purposes.”

The Bible refers to them as “eunuchs”:

“And as they were going along the road they came to some water, and the eunuch said, “See, here is water! What prevents me from being baptized?” And he commanded the chariot to stop, and they both went down into the water, Philip and the eunuch, and he baptized him." Acts 8:36-38

Eunuchs were brought about by castration: go here: https://www.christianity.com/wiki/people/what-is-a-eunuch-in-the-bible-definition-and-examples.html#four-meanings

“Sweet Loretta Modern thought she was a woman but she was another man.” ;<)

Get back Loretta.

Expand full comment

Weren't the eunuchs also slaves?

Expand full comment

In some cultures men wanting to attain high positions had to submit to castration because they were less likely to revolt against the king. As I recall, in China all men who were allowed access to the palace were eunuchs. It also kept them from messing with the harem.

Expand full comment

Sometimes but not always according to The Bible.

Expand full comment
founding

Heck yeah!

Expand full comment
founding
4 hrs agoLiked by Don Surber

The society we are living in is one created by the apathetic attitude to small anomalies that kept to a semi-privy clique bothering no one. Then came the televisions and film set promoting the unseemly leading to a society craving the 15 minutes of fame to where now sicko parents and Teachers are living through the innocent children. This started after the ten commmand ments and prayer were banned in schools and DOE was established. All the more reason to vote PDJT into office and try to return to moral sanity.

Expand full comment
founding

Excellent, Marlan-it'l be in my substack tomorrow

Expand full comment

Why are so many mothers pushing this on their children? I have a boy but wanted a girl so let's "change" him? Pretty sick and evil!

Expand full comment
6 hrs agoLiked by Don Surber

No matter how anyone may want to spin this skit, the expression on the child’s (Ariana Grande) face tells the whole story.

I’m surprised - actually, shocked is more like it - that they even performed it, but, hey, good on them.

Expand full comment
founding
6 hrs agoLiked by Don Surber

Yesterday I posted a lighthearted quip that got 117 likes (Cue my Sally Field’s moment) but I have nothing lighthearted to say about today’s post.

Expand full comment
4 hrs agoLiked by Don Surber

It is said that in pre-war Nazi Germany, the doctors were the earliest and most enthusiastic supporters of the regime. Why is this? At least in part, it boils down to the old theory of "Where you stand depends on where you sit."

Why do regimes license doctors? Yes, to (allegedly) ensure quality, but there's a more important reason: control. Doctors have so much time and money invested in their training and so much income down the drain if they lose their licenses that there is a very subtle - and no so subtle - pressure to knuckle under. Oppose regime dogma about the Clot Shots or ivermectin? Well, Doctor, you clearly are harming your patients, so we'll just send you a little hint: That's a nice medical license you have there. It would be a shame if something happened to it. And We Know Where You Live. Ask me how I know. And of course, someone trained, say, in Diagnostic Radiology - a highly technical sub-specialty - will have some trouble finding work if his license is lifted. Maybe hoeing somebody's garden or as a hod-carrier.

So don't count on your doctor to defend you, especially not in the current days of "me-me-me." He has far too much to lose.

Anyway, just my little theory.

Expand full comment
founding

In the Nazi era the university professors were just as enthusiastic about the regime as the doctors were. It all came down to JOBS and limiting the competition. But the downside was that after the war Germany never regained its prominence in Nobel Prize winners for science, which had been huge; now America had it, along with the nuclear bomb.

As Charlie Munger said about Hitler: "Imagine a guy stupid enough to to think that the way to advance science is to kick out the Jews."

Expand full comment

I had never heard that Munger quote. The first belly laugh I have had all day. I am stealing that.

Expand full comment
founding

I'm sure Charlie is OK with that, especially since he died last year -- at 99!

Expand full comment
3 hrs agoLiked by Don Surber

"But Obama’s decision to greenlight trans surgery — creating a multi-million-dollar medical industry — brought T into the limelight."

Good job getting to the heart of it, Don. There is no defendable reason for the boom in trans surgeries, especially in kids...except for the money!

Expand full comment
4 hrs agoLiked by Don Surber

I find today's rant less amusing and more troubling that ever. Isn't funny how this leads back to the mulatto/1st Black president, the slick speaking, somewhat eloquent community leader/organizer that the country swooned over, and just had to elect. I have seen very little hope, the change like this is not what I or anyone expected. I never bought into his hope and change bull shit anyway, but the electorate is plenty gullible and stupid, aka George Carlin. Abortion has been around a very long time, from the sketchy darkened alleys with rusty coathangers a plenty, to the Planned Parenthoods terminator style of today's killing factories. In my medical career abortions or D&Cs are carried out for a number reasons, not the confirmed method of birth control that Sangar wanted. I guess it's a multiple approach,blending moral, religious, ethical standards. In the end it is one helluva decision that one must make. Everyone deserves a second chance. At some time in the not to distant future, someones gonna have a shit ton of "splainin" to do to the MAN....

Expand full comment
founding

If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor-Obominablecare.

Expand full comment

yes I can hear and see that lie rolling off his tongue thru his pearly whites.

Expand full comment