The media protects Satanist

Erik Carnell isn’t trying to cover up his Satanism — but the media is. Carnell is the designer and supplier of the tranny propaganda clothing that Target decided to sell.

Christians said fine, we’re not going to Target anymore. The media is in an uproar falsely accusing protesters of threatening employees with violence.

The Washington Post owned by Jeff Bezos began the circling of media wagons with a story, “Trans designer dumped by Target explains how he got smeared as Satanist.”

But the Bezos Post let it slip that yes, he is a Satanist who wants to execute those who stand in his way.

Paragraph 5 said, Conservative “activists soon discovered Carnell’s independent web store, where he has sold, among other items, pins and medallions that used Satanic and occult imagery to make points about transphobia. A lavender, goat-headed medallion that reads ‘Satan respects pronouns’ is among his most popular designs. A pin depicting a guillotine with the label ‘Homophobe Headrest’ might be the edgiest.”

Edgiest? The man brags that Satan is on his side and that people who oppose the Gay Mafia deserve to have their heads lopped off. That last one is not a joke. It is not a warning. It is a promise.

Hailing Satan and calling to lop off the heads of conservatives is no big deal to the newspaper of the deep state. In fact, the Bezos Post’s handling of his Satanism was so sorry that it could have included the Seinfeld line: not that there is anything wrong with that.

The newspaper quoted Carnell as saying, “For starters, I don’t believe in Satan. If I believed in Satan, I’d have to believe in the Bible — and I consider myself an atheist.”

Hmm.

He does not believe in Satan and yet he seeks Satan’s endorsement. This is a reminder that 20 years ago, back when South Park was funny, the show depicted Satan as a being who was tormented by his homosexual relationship with Saddam Hussein.

The Bezos Post said of Carnell, “He is hardly the first person to embrace Satanic imagery to make a political point. The U.S.-based Satanic Temple — largely a collection of atheists and humanists — towed an eight-foot sculpture of the horned deity Baphomet to the Arkansas Capitol building several years ago, to call attention to conservative attacks on the separation of church and state.”

So Satanists aren’t Satanists to DC’s most popular paper, rather they are largely a collection of atheists and humanists. That makes about as much sense as saying a man is a woman, but the media does that too.

The media went out of its way to try to separate Target from Satan but imagine a buyer contracting with a supplier who also sold Confederate and Nazi flags on the side. No, Target signed up Carnell because he made that design that praised Satan for respecting pronouns — which is odd because Satan and his LGBT teammates don’t respect pronouns. If they did, we would not be having this argument over whether LGBT should be allowed to manipulate grammar.

The Bezos Post said, “The chain never actually sold any of Carnell’s Satan-ish merchandise, but it soon pulled his other items from its shelves, including a fanny pack with swirling planets that reads, ‘We belong everywhere,’ and a tote bag with a UFO that proclaims ‘Too queer for here.’”

Likewise Gannett made the same lame excuse for the Abprallen line of items that Carnell designed. Gannett said in a fact-check, “None of the products for the Target, Abprallen collaboration referenced Satan.”

In Paragraph 4, it said, “The ‘Satan respects pronouns’ shirt is for sale on Abprallen’s website for roughly $27.”

That’s more than I expected. I thought the price would be $6.66. He should thank Gannett for the free advertising.

Gannett also reported, “Police investigate bomb threats to Target stores in Utah over Pride Month merchandise.”

Paragraph 2 said the police said there was no credible threat, rendering the story clickbait.

Newsweek reported, “Target Faces Bomb Threats Amid LGBTQ+ Controversy.”

The magazine broke ranks by reporting what the threat actually said: “Target is full of . . . cowards who turned their back on the LGBT community and decided to cater to the homophobic right wing redneck bigots who protested and vandalized their store. We won't stand idly by as the far right continues to hunt us down.”

Given the history of left-wing violence be it BLM or Antifa, the email seems legit. However, no bombs were found at the five stores in Ohio that were targeted.

You know who really committed violence against Target? BLM looters. Jebra Faushay posted a video.

Notice the gay rainbow. The rainbow is a symbol of God’s covenant with Noah not to flood the world again. Satan stole it, just like he stole Bride’s Month and renamed it Pride Month.

Rupert Murdoch’s Wall Street Journal was slightly more subtle in tucking its pro-LGBT bias in a story called, “Combative Consumers Change the Marketing Strategy for Target and Bud Light.”

Its premise was, “In-person confrontations and the conservative focus on trans issues have disrupted the usual story of purpose-driven marketing, in which brands take stands on social issues.”

The conservative focus? No, dearie, the left started this. The left is surprised that conservatives reacted. We do not have the right to protest. Ours are called insurrections while their riots are called mostly peaceful protests.

The Rupert Journal said, “But critics this time were focused on transgender issues, which have climbed into the top ranks of conservative social agendas. And they combined their social-media messaging with tense in-person encounters.

“That proved enough to disrupt the usual patterns of purpose-driven marketing, in which brands position themselves as forces for good. The strategy’s biggest risks before this year were usually complaints by opponents of a given cause or, conversely, accusations of insufficient commitment to that cause.”

So in the newsroom of the Rupert Journal now it is accepted as fact that transvestism and the like are good causes that should be criticized only if the company does not go far enough in promoting the cause.

Rupert’s Journal said, “The growing number of brands that ran ads, sold rainbow products or changed their logos to support LGBT causes every June, for example, spawned the term rainbow-washing to describe a superficial act of Pride marketing.”

Hmm.

When will we see the rainbow Wall Street Journal logo?

Rupert’s Journal then said, “Then consumers this week knocked down Target displays, threatened employees and used social media to share angry videos from inside stores. Bud Light’s delivery drivers, sales representatives and independent distributors last month were confronted by people on the streets, in bars and in stores.”

There is no evidence that this happened. It is RussiaGate reporting. If the left says it is true, then it is true. Why bother checking it out?

Rupert’s Journal also made the lame point that Target is not directly selling the “Satan Respects Pronouns” merchandise. If Satan respects something, I don’t because he is the lord of lies.

Companies no longer are selling products. Instead they peddle an ideology.

The Daily Caller reported, “Target and Bud Light have lost a whopping $28 billion combined amid marketing decisions geared toward transgender individuals, according to a report from Fox Business.

“Bud Light promoted transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney for its March Madness contest, costing parent company Anheuser-Busch nearly $19 billion in fallout, Fox Business reported Friday. Shares are also down 14% amid the boycotts.

“Target was forced to pull some of its LGBTQ-themed items that catered to transgender individuals, cutting off more than $9 billion in market value with shares down 12.6%, according to the outlet.”

This is looney without a tune. Shareholders should force the CEOs out. This is a disgrace and an invitation to bankruptcy.

That no one in the media seems upset by the phrase “Satan Respects Pronouns” or upset by peddling LGBT to children tells you all you need to know about the biases in the modern newsroom. Stay away. My forecast is a sudden rise in pillars of salt.

As for Bud Light, Anheuser-Busch hasn’t had times this tough since Eliot Ness retired.

The New York Post reported, “Bud Light sales fell for the sixth consecutive week even as retailers slashed prices — with one store charging $3.49 for a 24-pack — to get rid of the unwanted beer as the nationwide boycott over its partnership with Dylan Mulvaney continued.

“Since Bud Light’s parent company Anheuser-Busch teamed up with transgender influencer Mulvaney, sales have fallen precipitously, and stores have been marking down the company’s products to get them off their shelves.”

That’s 15 cents a can. Beware. Ask a Cleveland Indian fan how 10-cent beer night went.

On the other hand, that will slow Bidenflation. Just have Mister Mulvaney endorse more products and watch the prices drop.

Now for today’s TOTALLY SCIENTIFIC POLL.