The vast majority of "the homeless" are mentally ill to some degree, or they are drug addicts - very few are on the street because a lender foreclosed on their home, or they were evicted from their apartment.
I'm glad you had the stomach to read that LA Times piece - advocacy "journalism" - because I'm sure I would not have.
The vast majority of "the homeless" are mentally ill to some degree, or they are drug addicts - very few are on the street because a lender foreclosed on their home, or they were evicted from their apartment.
I'm glad you had the stomach to read that LA Times piece - advocacy "journalism" - because I'm sure I would not have.
My lot is with the faceless, nameless rabble - this is not an elite group of which I have any desire to be a part.
Perhaps it's time for homelessness to be a crime - one as serious as homicide. If one of these homeless were incarcerated, I'll bet less would be spent on that individual as part of the prison population than is spent on him as one who is homeless.
If tax dollars are going to be spent on the "problem" anyway, why not find a way to spend as few dollars as possible?
No, spending our tax dollars on the "homeless" is not good because it helps get Democrats elected and re-elected. While it doesn't go directly to Mr. Green T-shirt, eventually Z will go away - either via coup, revolution, or courtesy of the KGB.
The vast majority of "the homeless" are mentally ill to some degree, or they are drug addicts - very few are on the street because a lender foreclosed on their home, or they were evicted from their apartment.
I'm glad you had the stomach to read that LA Times piece - advocacy "journalism" - because I'm sure I would not have.
My lot is with the faceless, nameless rabble - this is not an elite group of which I have any desire to be a part.
Perhaps it's time for homelessness to be a crime - one as serious as homicide. If one of these homeless were incarcerated, I'll bet less would be spent on that individual as part of the prison population than is spent on him as one who is homeless.
If tax dollars are going to be spent on the "problem" anyway, why not find a way to spend as few dollars as possible?
No, spending our tax dollars on the "homeless" is not good because it helps get Democrats elected and re-elected. While it doesn't go directly to Mr. Green T-shirt, eventually Z will go away - either via coup, revolution, or courtesy of the KGB.