253 Comments
User's avatar
MLR's avatar

“…but its leaders abandoned its actual mission of peace a long time ago.” And it has served as an anti-western, anti-American, and anti-Israel platform controlled by Islamists and Marxists dedicated to the destruction of the free world. I hope they go belly up and move the hell away from NYC to Somalia!

Joe LaGreca's avatar

I would have voted for moving it to Somalia.

OldeArtiste's avatar

...and give each U.N. representative his or her weapon: choice of AKM assault rifle or RPG-7 rocket-propelled grenade launcher.

Jeremy R's avatar

Provide them with custom fitted bomb vests. Then send them to Iran.

Robert Brusca's avatar

You could not afford the graft expense...

ron's avatar

Of course they'd be fine with it, because they "just want to help the world."

Chuck Goldman's avatar

Real simple!

The US out of the UN!

The UN out of the US.

Marlan Hoerer's avatar

Been wanting this since 1965ish C.G. .

Joe LaGreca's avatar

That's been my motto for ages.

Indydoc's avatar

Why wasnt Somalia on the quiz??

RevMikeyMac's avatar

Because then we would still be funding it...from Minneapolis.

Jeremy R's avatar

I'd nominate Tehran.

TeaPartyGal's avatar

If the UN continues to exist, I would prefer it be on American soil so we can spy on them and keep a close watch over their activities. We could start charging them rent for the land and buildings, tho.

Stephen Wolf's avatar

I would say that has been going on from the beginning. You know the old "J.R. Ewing saying: Keep your friends close and your enemies closer".

Brian LeMay's avatar

Pay ? Not those deadbeats , money only moves one way through the UN .

Robert Brusca's avatar

...and keep your enemies cioser

Brian LeMay's avatar

I would prefer they move it to Qatar ; makes targeting more economic ( fewer missiles ) . Besides they deserve one another .

Adorable Deplorable's avatar

Maybe Mayor Mamdani will do the right thing and convert the UN building to low income housing. LOL... how perfect would that be!!

Playswithneedles's avatar

Or maybe a homeless shelter for all those vagrants who are currently freezing to death on the streets of his city.

darrell's avatar

or as the CEOs of all the energy companies say, "Two weeks of super cold weather can fix a plethora of mismanagement.

OldeArtiste's avatar

I'll bet that this place will soon turn out like in the movie, "Escape from New York" with Kurt Russell.

Adorable Deplorable's avatar

Snake Plissken... great name!!

Crash Pile's avatar

David Rockefeller donated the land for the UN headquarters. It was previously slaughterhouses and tenements. So it would revert to its original purpose. But the UN completed a building renovation in 2015 spending $2.3B in an 8 year period. Mamdani could gut the building for far less money and make it rent controlled for zero rent. The Somalis would pay for energy and upkeep.

Wim de Vriend's avatar

I favor turning it into a big, beautiful Trump casino and hotel.

Adorable Deplorable's avatar

Would be the biggest and best casino ever!!

Marlan Hoerer's avatar

It already works like a casino as Americans lose their money to the house globalists.

Liberty Belle's avatar

LOL. I second that.

Stephen Wolf's avatar

Who wants to go to New York?

Retirednottired's avatar

Except that Mamdani loves the UN ideals of Muslim and Communist world dictatorships, so he would never disturb them.

darrell's avatar

Maybe convert it to a viral gain-of-function research lab. I hear Bill Gates is looking for work.

William Wallace's avatar

Should become a medical teaching college especially with all the Major Hospitals that are nearby.

Shoveltusker's avatar

The U.N. is like the Department of Education. Good White People™, who have the critical thinking skills of a dull 4th-grader, imagine that these organizations are saintly and worthy of support because of their names.

The U.N. unites nations! The Department of Education educates! How can anyone oppose these virtuous organizations?

Thing is, it's not just that there's no nation-uniting or educating going on; both organizations foster and breed cultural toxicity and general enshittification, even as their bloated taxpayer-funded budgets mostly pay for the sinecures of absolutely worthless functionaries.

Playswithneedles's avatar

Enshittification! What a great word! Mind if I borrow it?

OldeArtiste's avatar

Enshittification: Instead of bringing the low-level students to the level of the bright students, bring the bright students down.

Shoveltusker's avatar

I didn't coin it, but I am happy for it to be promulgated far and wide!

Greg Martin's avatar

An ingenious perspective. What is even more impressive was your ability to use shittifacation and sincures in the same sentence. Touché.

donald b welch's avatar

see my earlier post two minutes ago.

Suzie's avatar

For a “Groundhog Day2” movie they could just re-release the first movie!

Heh 😏

Skinnydip's avatar

Chuckle, chuckle...

steph_gray's avatar

So true! 😆

I recently bought the movie online, just so I'd have that "sequel" ready to enjoy tonight.

Cookie McCall's avatar

I feel like we just had a week of ground hog days with all the freezing cold down here in TX but with very little snow, not even enough to cover the grass but with enough ice to make travel a worry, still waiting for remains of ice to melt or evaporate but this week we're no longer below freezing and the power has stayed on the whole time. Maybe I'll be able to keep track of what day it is again!

Jim Nelson's avatar

Groundhog Day is one of those movies you can watch over and over and still enjoy as much as the first time you saw it. I think it and The Princess Bride are my two favorite movies that never get old. Neither needs a sequel.

Marsha R's avatar

Look up ‘Second Hand Lion’. It is a sleeper feel good movie we love to watch about every 3-4 months on movie night.

Marlan Hoerer's avatar

Amen M.R., wonderful sleeper.

Robert Brusca's avatar

Groundhog day is one of those movies you can watch over and over and over again and not realizing that you're watching it over and over and over again.

James Mead's avatar

Thanks for addressing this colossal wastes of money & collection of human garbage.

I remember being laughed at when I said Reagan should pull out. That's how long I've despised the UN

Jake's avatar

I've said it here before but the Trumpsters biggest win by far is exposing the titanic levels of graft that we didn't know about. Dems and RINO's don't care but maybe the independents will finally realize what's going on and move a little more to the right.

Gen Chang's avatar

Go to Benny Johnson's YouTube channel. He put up a sorta mini documentary on California's 100 billion homeless fraud! It's about 20 min, but, hits pretty hard.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4PXvPsFGCeo

Mike Smyth's avatar

The only organizations that actually decrease homelessness are privately funded. Union Gospel Mission, Salvation Army, and We Heart Seattle, to name just a few. The rest are part of the Homeless Industrial Complex. Big salaries, big staff, big failure.

Wim de Vriend's avatar

Big failures? Like all governmental organizations they primarily want to grow their staffs and budgets. Really solving problems would put the brake on all that.

James Mead's avatar

Big revelations they were

Indydoc's avatar

everybody talked trash about the UN, the Donald, just did it!

N.Wallace's avatar

The John Birch Society was saying it over 50 years ago.

Douglas Baringer's avatar

Oh, but they are crazy wackos and will ruin the country! At least that is what they told us. They being the established media goons, Cronkite, Huntly & Brinkly etc. I really struggled with that. The Birchers sounded perfectly sane to me, but everyone opposed them so I chickened out and was persuaded that thr Birchers were bad. We'll never know.

weedom1's avatar

I was not able to see a problem with Birch Society, particularly after learning that Diplomats were allowed to engage in criminal activity with impunity.

Robert Brusca's avatar

Oh we'te the John Birch society, John Birch society, here to save the country from a Communist plot.Join the John Birch soviety dtomping out the reds, we'll use our hands and hearts anf If we must , we'll use our heads

TeaPartyGal's avatar

You and a ton of alot of other people too. It was before my time, but I still was affected by the "sniff of disdain" from the Left and had always assumed the Birch Society was "a bunch of stupid racists" too.

Greg Martin's avatar

Mentioning the JBS reminded me of Joe Pyne. Probably because Joe interviewed Robert Welch founder of the JBS. Pyne had a tv interview show out of Philadelphia in the 1960’s. He was the original shock jock. He used to bring the usual lefty loons like Commies, homosexuals and feminists on his show in front of a live audience to debate, scream insults and kick them off of the show. Good times. I’m sure Mr. Surber remembers.

James Mead's avatar

Yup and their office was in my old home town

Robert Brusca's avatar

It is noble to help people less fortunate than you.And 2 try to give them a way to improve themselves.However, when all you're doing is shoveling money into a sink hole and not improving anything.Maybe it's time to stop shoveling. Give me a fish and I'll come to your door every day to beg for another one. Teach me to fish and you'll never see me again.

Shrugged's avatar

After USAID and the Somalian Daycare fraud, why would we fund the UN? It's time to pull out and kick them out. The UN is a larger version of USAID.

Marlene Swann's avatar

Better yet, let’s just move the UN headquarters to Somalia and cut out all the middle men with their hands out! Then we can put the new Board of Peace in the former building that SAID it is dedicated to charitable, peace keeping motives, but the proof is in their cutting programs instead of pork bureaucrats! Where’s the lie, tho?!

donald b welch's avatar

agreed but will never happen. aoc will triple their funding and half of that increase will go to worldwide abortion.

book it dano!

WTPuck's avatar

Money-laundering outfits, every government and international agency.

Shrugged's avatar

Yes. And, Congress doesn't care because both parties benefit indirectly.

Joe LaGreca's avatar

I was surprised that Trump made that comment about keeping the UN in NYC & that it has tremendous potential - he has to be kidding.

Suzie's avatar

When you’ve been the only business selling widgets for decades, and suddenly a competitor pops up down the street, you’re going to be forced to rethink your entire business model or go under.

steph_gray's avatar

Probably on 🎯 !

ron's avatar

Note the Donald apparently has complately ignored the un in all his diplomatic work and ending wars. The un is worse than useless.

Marlene Swann's avatar

I didn’t understand that myself? I must have missed the context, or perhaps he was tongue in cheek referring to his future plans for the Board of Peace….

steph_gray's avatar

I never take PDJT literally (the way the left does) when he says something like this.

His true meaning always emerges later on down the line...

weedom1's avatar

He keeps his enemies close, which is a difficult strategy for most to endure.

Joe LaGreca's avatar

You didn't miss anything - he was definitely referring to the UN.

Wim de Vriend's avatar

I don't think he was lying. Lots of organizations have tremendous potential, but never fulfill it. Two different things.

Ken H's avatar

Trump is a builder! This makes sense in the context of taking a failed, bankrupt property, completely gutting it, and rebuilding it as something of value.

Robert Brusca's avatar

Bored of peace

..???

Douglas Baringer's avatar

That statement will calm the UN Clowns and lull them into a false sense of security.

TeaPartyGal's avatar

The UN does have tremendous potential. If it was cleaned up, (and if the world itself was cleaned up), it could still serve a purpose. Trump is building a better UN in the Board of Peace, which could at some point just replace the UN. Just like MAGA is building a better Republican party and at some point will succeed in replacing all the RINO's.

Shrugged's avatar
8hEdited

USAID started as a good idea too, but waving money and power in front of politicians, many of whom are from poor third-world countries, is like making a recovering alcoholic a bartender at a wedding reception.

Good luck with that.

Retirednottired's avatar

In a similar vein, Mamdani the Genius, has appointed an EX-CON as his head of Dept of Corrections. You cannot make this stuff up….

Robert Brusca's avatar

Who better to

Know...

Shrugged's avatar

Yes. We knew from the day they called themselves the "Democratic" party that it was all a big paradox of reality.

ron's avatar

It never did serve a purpose. Has the un ever actually accomplished anything except expend massive amounts of mostly US money?

ron's avatar

It's called diplomat talk. Lots of buttering up.

Robert Brusca's avatar

Reshaping the globally economy every day...

Suzie's avatar

The only logical response to Guterres is, “What have you done for me lately?”The UN is nothing more than an internationally corrupt, criminal money laundering operation, of which the lionshare of the money keeping the game afloat has always been provided by the US for decades upon decades.

Just like NATO, and USAID, and a plethora of other high minded organizations and operations running rampant around the world, all have been sponging off of the US for decades.

It is beyond heartening to see our President and Secretary of State throw the wrench of all wrenches into all these corrupt, crooked and wholly anti-American machines and say, “NO MORE FREE LUNCH ON US.”

CactusMatt32's avatar

Take a national referendum -taxpaying US Citizens only….of how much the US should support each UN program….

Byron King's avatar

USA assessment is north of $10 billion for UN. While China assessment is about $600 million. (Which China usually pays late.).

Meanwhile, China dominates many UN agencies like WHO, and routinely rounds up votes that go against US. Yet somehow , USA is expected to fund this circus contra its own interests.

As for ability to pay…. China has run up massive trade surpluses w almost every country in the world, dumping its excess output at prices intended to strangle local competition. But again, China assessment for UN is <6% of what they want US to pay.

UN is hardly worth the time or $$. Yesterday’s idea. Yesterday’s people. Yesterday’s world.

Skinnydip's avatar

Amen, brother!

ron's avatar

And china is still classified by them as a "developing nation." Nuclear bombers, ICBMs, and subs; almost the biggest economy in the world; astronauts, space stations, huge military, and they still are classified a "developing nation."

Étienne Boétie's avatar

". . . the UN has morphed into an unaccountable worldwide bureaucracy with mission creeps into culture, health and human rights. No one opposes these things per se . . ." Actually, I oppose these things per se. By "healthcare" the UN means abortion and forced covid shots. By "human rights" the UN means forcing conservative cultures to tolerate homosexual behavior like that running rampant in the decadent, post -Christian West. The UN is not a force for good in the world or for peace. It is a force for moral chaos and a shield for dictators. It should be abolished.

Suzie's avatar

It has also been a major driver of mass immigration flows into Western countries, creating probably one the greatest threats to western civilization since the atom bomb.

Indydoc's avatar

Why does this always happen to altruistic institutions??

Wim de Vriend's avatar

Because the Left always infiltrates existing institutions; disguised by the trappings of respectability, its subversive goals are achieved far more easily. Look around and see what has happened to the Episcopal and other establishment churches, to the public schools and universities, the Boy Scouts, the DAR ...

Brian LeMay's avatar

In shorter terms they see a way to get their hands on someone else's hard earned money without expending much effort .

RevMikeyMac's avatar

Because good people get busy with their own lives and stop paying attention...they just keep writing the checks and paying the "bills".

ron's avatar

un is not an altruistic institution.

Jake's avatar

I wonder how much UN money comes back to our politicians?? The Trumpster is cutting the mothers milk of politics, graft dressed as empathy.

tzed's avatar

If you don’t fund it they won’t come. That goes for our various programs that invite fraud.

Gen Chang's avatar

MUNGA? I think the fact that the UN has been complicit in funneling migrants into western nations is a big middle finger to the US. Trump could be looking to reform the UN by starving them into submission? A negotiating tactic?

CactusMatt32's avatar

Their “4-10s” Refugee Plan could get Trump funding…..resettling 10 million refugees for four years….Back Out of the US…..

CactusMatt32's avatar

If the UN had it in their 2020-2024 US fully paid up budget by Biden - to assist/coordinate w other NGOs, Countries, Soros/Cartel/CatholicCharities and Contractors to facilitate importing Illegal immigrants into the US, and US States funded illegal living & medical expenses while here…. I bet Trump w/b willing to fund a UN Program to assist ICE in Deporting them the hell back OUT of the US.

Just not holding my breath…still waiting after Reagan got taken on the 1986 Amnesty bait-n-switch by Congress…

Jake's avatar

Sounds about right. All Trumpian moves are with a plan. Let's see if the UN comes back with a reorganization proposal.

Albert P. Sweeney's avatar

Move it to Antarctica and you will see how important it is. The UN is a bureaucrat’s dream. Make huge salaries, enjoy diplomatic immunity, and not have to live in your shithole of a country. All can be had in Antarctica. Yet for some reason it’s in the largest city in the world in the freest country in the world, spewing hate towards its host. I wonder why that is??

telephoneman's avatar

UN looks to me like the dictatorship called the EU.. non-elected bureaucrats running STUPID,

no gas from Russia? better cut down your neighbor's tree for heat.. foolish masses

Deb Hill's avatar

No gas from Russia? Unless it's indirectly bought from India. It's the same with their auto sector. Volkswagen could be forced to pay hundreds of millions of euros to Chinese rivals to buy carbon credits under EU rules. They have the "choice" of paying billions of euros in fines, boosting EV sales by slashing prices, or buying credits from less polluting competitors. I find it interesting that China is being hailed as less polluting, even though it opens hundreds of coal plants each year.

Crash Pile's avatar

Please, don’t enshitify Antarctic. It’s the last place on earth with minimal shit.

WTPuck's avatar

Somalia it is.

imkitty's avatar

It p-o's me, too.

Brian Smith's avatar

Trump could refit it as a resort/casino…already staffed with potential housekeepers, gardeners, and bell hops….

John Wiles's avatar

One of the reasons I find Don Surber's thinking and mine to be so aligned is, because in every column, I find some quotable phrase or sentence that resonates strongly within me. Today it was "unaccountable worldwide bureaucracy". The UN was designed as a 'Peacekeeping' organization to prevent the consequences of another world war. World Wars 1 and 2 showed all people, everywhere, that the destruction of mankind is available and, if brought to bear, irreversible. Out of genuinely good ideas (like setting up the UN in the US, who kept the world from speaking German or Japanese), there always seems to be born ever new levels of bureaucracy birthed under the guise of 'doing good'. Our own Congress has 'devolved' into much the same thing. I think more and more people are catching on to what President Trump is trying to achieve - the 'biggest' and the 'baddest' (USA) doing the 'most' and 'best' for the rest of the world to actually make, not only the US, but the world a better place. The world needs a leader, and we have one, not a global 'ruler' or 'king', but someone who has a vision that could propel the world ahead for a very long time. So far, Trump is winning the 16-level chessboard of the world. Keep playing, President Trump. Keep playing.

William Coulter's avatar

The UN has gone so far off the rails as to what was supposed to do that it isn’t worth “saving”.

steph_gray's avatar

I think it's worse than that, and they never intended for a moment to do what they were "supposed to do."

I'm now quite sure the money I spent as a ten year old on UN merch went directly to leftist causes without a moment's delay.

MissippiPolok's avatar

"...trick or treat for UNICEF!"

MissippiPolok's avatar

Yeah, I'm that old...

steph_gray's avatar

Me too, and I vaguely remember something like that...

ron's avatar

It's still around.

Cookie McCall's avatar

I did "trick or treat for UNICEF" back in the day

Marlan Hoerer's avatar

Memory lane M.P. .