The are only two ways to get into a Federal Courthouse. You can show a legitimate Identity card or you can be escorted in chains by a law enforcement officer. ID or handcuffs.
Yes. I was a witness recently in a civil court case. In order to get into the court building and access the courtroom, I had to show ID, my bag was put through an x-ray machine, and my body was scanned with a metallic wand. My watch set it off! Have rules and enforce them.
When I lived in DC in the1990 era we ALWAYS had to go through scanners and when I went to see Clinton at Arlington cemetery, I was scanned all over with some hand held device. This is not news, folks.
When I went to college there in the 1960’s none of this existed. We went everywhere exploring our government. Only the White House was off limits except for my fraternity brother who bet he could climb the fence, race across the lawn, climb the side of the White House and grab the flag. He did. He didn’t get shot but escorted down and told not to do it again.
I remember walking to the Capitol up the magnificent steps, walking around inside, going into watch the session, finding my Rep office etc.
But in order to get out after being escorted in you might run into a judge who will try to sneak you out. Whatever judges do being made legal by judicial action in their minds. Recently read a post touting the use of the progressives standards and laws against them. I hope that someone takes that idea seriously.
Shrugged, Not to be 'picky' but for the record it was not a 'hanging' chad but a DANGLING chad. That was back in the day when Chad's could and all did dangle. Today, who the eff knows.
If you recall all the news coverage of camera close-ups of chads and the repetitive explanations of how the mechanical voting systems were used was insane. That is, the election of the most powerful position in the world "dangled" by a thread of attached paper.
That whole scenario was foreshadowing of our lives with the DNC. What a nightmare. Then, in 2015/16 the DNC went on to create fake Russia dossiers to falsely incriminate an innocent man running for the most powerful position in the world.
HINDSIGHT 201: Dangling or hanging aside, with what we now know, the photos in question were fraudulent and provided by ... Dominion (?) or the proponents for electronic tabulations. Fakes and such frauds are nothing new. Trust nothing, and no one.
That event really was the trigger that bought us a very dangerous Left. That was when the vitriol started in earnest. By 2005 and the very wrong Iraq War... Man... Casey Sheehan... Things were changing in a very bad way.
The evil of two lessers. We got obamunism because the establishment chose to offer Mc Stain as the Republican choice and Mittens Romneycare in round two.
You call them mainstream, I call them puppets who dance for their masters. I might be wrong, but nearly all of the Republicans in Washington are owned by the Gates - Soros crowd. They all have accepted speaking fees and book deals.
You are quite right. If MAGA went back to 1960, most of MAGA would have voted for JFK, who in many ways, was more conservative than Nixon. MAGA is the party of common sense, for the most part, not of a particular ideology. Do what works, not what sounds good in a speech, or feels good to the emotions of women.
With each passing year, W's stock keeps going down. I also voted for him twice & contributed to his 2 campaigns. I don't regret supporting W. as any DEM would have been worse - but he sure did a ton of damage. His silence as Trump was hunted by the left speaks volumes about his character - never defended Trump once.
Indeed. Even Grandad Prescott back in the day. They wrote glowing reports and were friendly with Osama in the 70s growing the heroin trade to fund the war against the Soviets in the 80s... Imperial America is broken badly.
In voting that way you had enough company -- including myself -- to prevent the country being ruled by a sanctimonious drone who would have imposed the Green New Deal on steroids. In politics especially, choosing the LEAST BAD option is a perfectly reasonable thing to do. And, Trump was not on that particular ballot.
I willingly voted for W the first time. I thought he'd been a good Governor here in TX and when 9/11 happened, I was extremely grateful we had him rather than Gore as President. Subsequently, he has become an embarrassment
Congress had a piece of the action in enabling the Patriot/TSA/Homeland acts too. Bush gets the credit for those aberrations to democracy, but recent House speakers (Boehner, Ryan, Pelosi) made the heavy lift for Obama to use them against our citizens.
Absolutely. When I say W I mean the whole of government and I hope G-d damns both parties; our government is so corrupt we can't even imagine.
Once you follow @MikeBenzCyber on or datarepublican (small r) on X your life will be changed. What our government has done since the inception of the CIA is mind numbing. I am not sure that we can restore this great experiment as we are involved in every single country in the world.
I didn’t vote for either Bush, but was always grateful that the guy I did vote for didn’t win. Ditto Obama. I remember though my father (the smartest man I ever knew) was all-in on W, particularly after 9/11. We sparred on the Patriot Act & his incessant comeback was always the neocon motto- the constitution is not a suicide part. Apparently it is only applicable to olive skinned people with scrawny beards, but not so much to invading armies of people who have common genetic characteristics.
I will henceforth think of Sotomayor as Larry, Jackson as Curly and Kagan as Moe. Could someone versed in AI please render this into an eye-poking video? Please
The party of sore losers wanted what to expand to 12 supreme court justices? I mean 'pack the court' with even nine (9) stooges is difficult to imagine.
Yes, remember them in your prayers. There are funds being set up to collect money for them, but Charlie had many friends who will make sure his family is well cared for. Right now, the best thing we all can do is pray, asking God to help them get through this horrible event.
Imagine being the parents of the perp and bless the dad for turning him in. That must have been heart wrenching but the righteous and decent choice to make. The kids is young and pleasant looking which just goes to show you..its the Ted Bundy syndrome, i.e., you can't tell a book by it's cover. But if he gets the death penalty will he then also become a martyr to the left???
Every time a lower court judge makes a decision that goes to appeal or Supreme, the judge should have to appear and explain their reasoning in person. That higher court should also be able to levy fines, admonishments or removal actions when they rule. The law system either needs to police itself or the senate needs to start impeaching rogue moron "judges".
100% agree. That was the very first step in the libs march toward control. With a properly Constituted Senate, 75% of these crap laws would never have seen a vote.
Hey, hold on there! 65 these days is too young. I know numerous people my age, 75, who are still sharp and involved. Age limits of 75 at time of election would be more reasonable. If you turn 76 the week before the election, you’re out!
I am very energetic as well. But we need to get out of the way for the younger generations. When we stay at work until 70-75-80, we limit others from advancing and still others from obtaining entry-level. We are part of the employment problem for young adults. You want to work? Thats great. Start your own business. But out of politics and out of the way.
…“a sore loser party that tried to run a senile old man against Trump last year before backing off and sending in a retard. They cannot make a biopic of Kamala Harris because the movie title Clueless was already taken.”
It's a very advanced skill to utter a legal statement that's funny as hell. As Brett Kavanaugh commented, in support of the Supremes' junking of the latest black-robe-insanity:
"... reasonable suspicion means only that immigration officers may briefly stop the individual and inquire about immigration status. If the person is a U. S. citizen or otherwise lawfully in the United States, that individual will be free to go after the brief encounter. … The interests of individuals who are illegally in the country in avoiding being stopped by law enforcement for questioning is ultimately an interest in evading the law. That is not an especially weighty legal interest.”
The leftist position on asking for identification has always been consistent. Remember how they opposed, "stop and frisk"? It's just their way of immunizing all the freaks, losers and weirdos of society against any possibility of adverse consequences. Look like you were born of hispanic/latino parentage? You get to break our immigration laws with impunity. Got black/brown skin? You get to carry illegal weapons without any possibility of being arrested for that. If, on the other hand, you are light skinned, blond or otherwise look like your parents came from Europe, you get the full weight of the law pressed down upon you, no excuses. That is how we arrived at the place where TSA agents were strip searching elderly white women in wheelchairs for bombs and guns but ignoring all the black/brown skinned and kaffiyah-wearing travelers in airports. We got here because we, by which I mean the normal majority, believe in the rule of law, where we conform our actions to prevailing legal standards without pitching a fit about everything. We have suffered in silence for so long, our enemies on the left believe that is how we shall always behave. Let us now disabuse them of that notion.
Who else here is surprised that stupid people- in this case wearing black robes - are “confused” about facts and truth? Just the fact that there are so many DEI justices and judges is an affront to right thinking people. Those of us that remain, anyway.
Yes; the Left does not realize the degree to which it has been shooting itself in its own foot with all these DEI "accomplishments". It is not a good thing when the ordinary citizen can easily see straight thru the dumb words of a supposed-to-be-respected college president, judge, etc.
Actually what the Left has done is pepper the whole country with "poster childs" of Leftist incompetence and malfeasance.
Obliquely related, Town Hall has a column today listing many Leftist nationwide who have celebrated, in one fashion or another, the death of Charlie Kirk. People in education, medicine, child care, government. Hopefully, bringing them into the light will end their employment at least, and perhaps give them pause to think about the callousness of their remarks.
The second problem is that while we see the first problem, the left sees a feature. The slippery slope fast becomes a cliff. Rome fell in much the same way.
The executive branch has withered as a reaction to FDR’s overreach and with Nixon’s takedown. Trump appears prepared to reverse the trend and may take an Andrew Jackson stance.
Her whackopedia entry is hard to make sense of, but horizontal Harris graduated from highschool in Montreal CANADA. Clueless Outta Canada is my choice.
The way the Democrats and media twist and mutilate very word in the Constitution to erase this country's founding principles puts them all in a category equal to the the murderer of Charlie Kirk.
Both are ungodly routes to the same destination: Destruction of America and our dreams/hopes.
I lost patience with the left after Butler last July. Today, I am ready to suit up and start fighting.
A very accurate description of what is going on with Democrats using the courts to try to get through what they couldn’t possibly get through legislatively.
I’m still suspicious of the Supreme Court long after the Roger Taney court declared slaves as property. These deciders are just people not gods with black robes and people make decisions both good and not so good.
Nowadays, the same goes for a lot of the clergy. Consider the empty but multi-colored sack that made a point of irritating Trump right after his inauguration. The first major achievement of his second term was staying put and not stomping out of there.
But yes, I have wondered sometimes if we'd get better results from the bench if its occupants were ordered to wear swimming trunks instead of robes. Just like boots were made for walkin', robes were made for pretendin'.
I've a modest proposal for the Supreme Court. The next time one of these idiotic district court decisions (e.g. Boasberg) needs to be reversed, vacate every decision that judge has ever made as his decisions are clearly justified ideologically rather than legally. Basically pull his teeth by telling the world all his rulings can be ignored because he clearly does not follow the law anyway.
Problem is, that judge has made hundreds of not thousands of rulings most of which fall within the norms. We only hear lately of these egregious missteps and oversteps. Not every ruling is incorrect
Don,
Don't forget. The federal judges believe in the 47th Amendment to the Constitution:
“Anything Donald Trump does or is in favor of is unconstitutional.”
The are only two ways to get into a Federal Courthouse. You can show a legitimate Identity card or you can be escorted in chains by a law enforcement officer. ID or handcuffs.
Yes. I was a witness recently in a civil court case. In order to get into the court building and access the courtroom, I had to show ID, my bag was put through an x-ray machine, and my body was scanned with a metallic wand. My watch set it off! Have rules and enforce them.
When I lived in DC in the1990 era we ALWAYS had to go through scanners and when I went to see Clinton at Arlington cemetery, I was scanned all over with some hand held device. This is not news, folks.
When I went to college there in the 1960’s none of this existed. We went everywhere exploring our government. Only the White House was off limits except for my fraternity brother who bet he could climb the fence, race across the lawn, climb the side of the White House and grab the flag. He did. He didn’t get shot but escorted down and told not to do it again.
I remember walking to the Capitol up the magnificent steps, walking around inside, going into watch the session, finding my Rep office etc.
what a different world. Ruined by democrats.
In the mid 80s I wandered the halls of the Capitol building hassle-free.
I.D. for all except invaders and illegitimate voters doncha know, rules by and for dem/media whack jobs.
But in order to get out after being escorted in you might run into a judge who will try to sneak you out. Whatever judges do being made legal by judicial action in their minds. Recently read a post touting the use of the progressives standards and laws against them. I hope that someone takes that idea seriously.
Great piece and this response has only a little to do with it, sir.
I am triggered. Every time I hear 4th Amendment I remember how George W Bush destroyed it with the Patriot Act, TSA, Homeland Security, et al.
Then Obama(and establishment republicans) weaponized it against us. UniParty 101.
Sorry, W is bottom five president for me; yes I voted for him twice. My bad.
If you hadn’t voted for bad-Bush-we would have worse-Al Gore or even worse than that John Kerry.
Yes sir, that was exactly my thoughts at the time.
Our club has many members Danimal28.
It was close too. Bush only won by a hanging chad.
While barely beating a clanging cad.
Shrugged, Not to be 'picky' but for the record it was not a 'hanging' chad but a DANGLING chad. That was back in the day when Chad's could and all did dangle. Today, who the eff knows.
Thanks for the clarification.
If you recall all the news coverage of camera close-ups of chads and the repetitive explanations of how the mechanical voting systems were used was insane. That is, the election of the most powerful position in the world "dangled" by a thread of attached paper.
That whole scenario was foreshadowing of our lives with the DNC. What a nightmare. Then, in 2015/16 the DNC went on to create fake Russia dossiers to falsely incriminate an innocent man running for the most powerful position in the world.
How does this end?
HINDSIGHT 201: Dangling or hanging aside, with what we now know, the photos in question were fraudulent and provided by ... Dominion (?) or the proponents for electronic tabulations. Fakes and such frauds are nothing new. Trust nothing, and no one.
EXCEPT God.
That event really was the trigger that bought us a very dangerous Left. That was when the vitriol started in earnest. By 2005 and the very wrong Iraq War... Man... Casey Sheehan... Things were changing in a very bad way.
The evil of two lessers. We got obamunism because the establishment chose to offer Mc Stain as the Republican choice and Mittens Romneycare in round two.
You are referring to "mainstream Republicans".
Main stream Republicans are just like mainstream media: All lies and total BS.
MAGA isn't Republican.
You call them mainstream, I call them puppets who dance for their masters. I might be wrong, but nearly all of the Republicans in Washington are owned by the Gates - Soros crowd. They all have accepted speaking fees and book deals.
You are quite right. If MAGA went back to 1960, most of MAGA would have voted for JFK, who in many ways, was more conservative than Nixon. MAGA is the party of common sense, for the most part, not of a particular ideology. Do what works, not what sounds good in a speech, or feels good to the emotions of women.
The gay muslim and its puppeteers are what gave us PDJT and after a stolen election the silent majority roared , now we are whispering imho.
I lived in Tampa and was a poll worker. It was a crazy night
And therein lies the problem.
With each passing year, W's stock keeps going down. I also voted for him twice & contributed to his 2 campaigns. I don't regret supporting W. as any DEM would have been worse - but he sure did a ton of damage. His silence as Trump was hunted by the left speaks volumes about his character - never defended Trump once.
My grace is gone. W may have been a good guy that the system(Cheney) chewed up, but you have to stand on your own. He hasn't. Nuff said.
His daddy was the "father" of this.
Indeed. Even Grandad Prescott back in the day. They wrote glowing reports and were friendly with Osama in the 70s growing the heroin trade to fund the war against the Soviets in the 80s... Imperial America is broken badly.
In voting that way you had enough company -- including myself -- to prevent the country being ruled by a sanctimonious drone who would have imposed the Green New Deal on steroids. In politics especially, choosing the LEAST BAD option is a perfectly reasonable thing to do. And, Trump was not on that particular ballot.
I willingly voted for W the first time. I thought he'd been a good Governor here in TX and when 9/11 happened, I was extremely grateful we had him rather than Gore as President. Subsequently, he has become an embarrassment
Congress had a piece of the action in enabling the Patriot/TSA/Homeland acts too. Bush gets the credit for those aberrations to democracy, but recent House speakers (Boehner, Ryan, Pelosi) made the heavy lift for Obama to use them against our citizens.
Absolutely. When I say W I mean the whole of government and I hope G-d damns both parties; our government is so corrupt we can't even imagine.
Once you follow @MikeBenzCyber on or datarepublican (small r) on X your life will be changed. What our government has done since the inception of the CIA is mind numbing. I am not sure that we can restore this great experiment as we are involved in every single country in the world.
Hey , you are in good company . Al Gore ? John Kerry ? Heaven forbid , we did the right thing at the time .
I didn’t vote for either Bush, but was always grateful that the guy I did vote for didn’t win. Ditto Obama. I remember though my father (the smartest man I ever knew) was all-in on W, particularly after 9/11. We sparred on the Patriot Act & his incessant comeback was always the neocon motto- the constitution is not a suicide part. Apparently it is only applicable to olive skinned people with scrawny beards, but not so much to invading armies of people who have common genetic characteristics.
CORRECTION:having just turned 75 I am pleading senior moment. I did vote for Bill C & he won & once for W.
You're not alone.
Ditto
I will henceforth think of Sotomayor as Larry, Jackson as Curly and Kagan as Moe. Could someone versed in AI please render this into an eye-poking video? Please
Please do not insult the Stooges ,use flying bats or vultures Steve.
My bad
That would be delightful!
Kagan: "Why I oughtta..."
Sotomayor: "Oh! A wise guy, eh?" (bops KJB on top of the head)
KJB: "Woop woop woop woop woop!" (while doing the Curly Shuffle)
The party of sore losers wanted what to expand to 12 supreme court justices? I mean 'pack the court' with even nine (9) stooges is difficult to imagine.
Chuckled at Jussie Smollett, thinking Don is clever today, and then LOL at Her Crew🤣😂 Happy Friday to all and prayers for the Kirk family✝️
Indeed. Remember the Kirks. ✝️
Yes, remember them in your prayers. There are funds being set up to collect money for them, but Charlie had many friends who will make sure his family is well cared for. Right now, the best thing we all can do is pray, asking God to help them get through this horrible event.
Imagine being the parents of the perp and bless the dad for turning him in. That must have been heart wrenching but the righteous and decent choice to make. The kids is young and pleasant looking which just goes to show you..its the Ted Bundy syndrome, i.e., you can't tell a book by it's cover. But if he gets the death penalty will he then also become a martyr to the left???
Not a chance , he's a WASP .
Well then thank God for that small favor!
Every time a lower court judge makes a decision that goes to appeal or Supreme, the judge should have to appear and explain their reasoning in person. That higher court should also be able to levy fines, admonishments or removal actions when they rule. The law system either needs to police itself or the senate needs to start impeaching rogue moron "judges".
In order for that to happen, we need to get rid of the communists in the Senate. And every RINO.
Okay. They're all boomers. Age limits for public service. say 65? And they're gone.
Don't disagree, but we also need to repeal the 17th amendment and give states back their rights.
100% agree. That was the very first step in the libs march toward control. With a properly Constituted Senate, 75% of these crap laws would never have seen a vote.
Hey, hold on there! 65 these days is too young. I know numerous people my age, 75, who are still sharp and involved. Age limits of 75 at time of election would be more reasonable. If you turn 76 the week before the election, you’re out!
I am very energetic as well. But we need to get out of the way for the younger generations. When we stay at work until 70-75-80, we limit others from advancing and still others from obtaining entry-level. We are part of the employment problem for young adults. You want to work? Thats great. Start your own business. But out of politics and out of the way.
We also need to make sure we have mentored those young adults. Much of what I see on the campuses is unfit for office and frankly, any job.
There's plenty of good people we can hire and ignore these bums of which you speak.
Excellent proposal Greg
Amen Cookie AND Greg !!
…“a sore loser party that tried to run a senile old man against Trump last year before backing off and sending in a retard. They cannot make a biopic of Kamala Harris because the movie title Clueless was already taken.”
~ LOVE THIS!
The last election was an IQ test for the USA. Thank goodness we passed this time!
Truly!!
Let’s also hope we the people have been keeping up with our “studies” for the midterms.
In sane world it would be beyond a landslide.
It's a very advanced skill to utter a legal statement that's funny as hell. As Brett Kavanaugh commented, in support of the Supremes' junking of the latest black-robe-insanity:
"... reasonable suspicion means only that immigration officers may briefly stop the individual and inquire about immigration status. If the person is a U. S. citizen or otherwise lawfully in the United States, that individual will be free to go after the brief encounter. … The interests of individuals who are illegally in the country in avoiding being stopped by law enforcement for questioning is ultimately an interest in evading the law. That is not an especially weighty legal interest.”
The leftist position on asking for identification has always been consistent. Remember how they opposed, "stop and frisk"? It's just their way of immunizing all the freaks, losers and weirdos of society against any possibility of adverse consequences. Look like you were born of hispanic/latino parentage? You get to break our immigration laws with impunity. Got black/brown skin? You get to carry illegal weapons without any possibility of being arrested for that. If, on the other hand, you are light skinned, blond or otherwise look like your parents came from Europe, you get the full weight of the law pressed down upon you, no excuses. That is how we arrived at the place where TSA agents were strip searching elderly white women in wheelchairs for bombs and guns but ignoring all the black/brown skinned and kaffiyah-wearing travelers in airports. We got here because we, by which I mean the normal majority, believe in the rule of law, where we conform our actions to prevailing legal standards without pitching a fit about everything. We have suffered in silence for so long, our enemies on the left believe that is how we shall always behave. Let us now disabuse them of that notion.
Well, it was consistent until Zhou Xiden floated the notion of quackcine passports.
Since that would punish people who think aka conservatives, they were for it.
We had vaccine passports in Montreal during the pandemic. It was a major violation of our civil liberties.
“They cannot make a biopic of Kamala Harris because the movie title Clueless was already taken.” Classic Don Serber!
Like the unsuccessful lawfare waged against DJT when he was out of office this iteration will also fail!
Who else here is surprised that stupid people- in this case wearing black robes - are “confused” about facts and truth? Just the fact that there are so many DEI justices and judges is an affront to right thinking people. Those of us that remain, anyway.
Yes; the Left does not realize the degree to which it has been shooting itself in its own foot with all these DEI "accomplishments". It is not a good thing when the ordinary citizen can easily see straight thru the dumb words of a supposed-to-be-respected college president, judge, etc.
Actually what the Left has done is pepper the whole country with "poster childs" of Leftist incompetence and malfeasance.
Obliquely related, Town Hall has a column today listing many Leftist nationwide who have celebrated, in one fashion or another, the death of Charlie Kirk. People in education, medicine, child care, government. Hopefully, bringing them into the light will end their employment at least, and perhaps give them pause to think about the callousness of their remarks.
The second problem is that while we see the first problem, the left sees a feature. The slippery slope fast becomes a cliff. Rome fell in much the same way.
The executive branch has withered as a reaction to FDR’s overreach and with Nixon’s takedown. Trump appears prepared to reverse the trend and may take an Andrew Jackson stance.
He's kinda McKinleyesque too. ☺️
I think that “Clueless from California” is still available.
Clueless Outta California
Her whackopedia entry is hard to make sense of, but horizontal Harris graduated from highschool in Montreal CANADA. Clueless Outta Canada is my choice.
Funny, Jeremy!
LOL. You are correct sir. I defer.
Maybe we should send her north and she can run for Primed Minister. Can't be worse than Castreau.
We don't want her. Canada has enough problems. Let California keep her.
Is Outta Canada anywhere near Outta Mongolia?
Even mo’ betta!
The way the Democrats and media twist and mutilate very word in the Constitution to erase this country's founding principles puts them all in a category equal to the the murderer of Charlie Kirk.
Both are ungodly routes to the same destination: Destruction of America and our dreams/hopes.
I lost patience with the left after Butler last July. Today, I am ready to suit up and start fighting.
Whatever it takes.
Easy ‘S’.
Even James Woods said yesterday we won’t put up with this a 3rd time.
What’s that line. Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. But 3 times is Enemy Action.
Besides, they’re trying to goad us. As I said at the beginning… Easy!
Once was enemy action, the second was also. It is our belief in a just GOD and his authority that holds us in check.
That works, but is also the truth. As long as we don’t go off half cocked and either hurt the wrong people or head in the wrong direction.
The commies would love that!
Thanks for the reminder.
I've never been mature enough to follow 'political correctness' but I'm trying.
I hope you are mature enough to tell those demons demanding political correctness to stick it.
A very accurate description of what is going on with Democrats using the courts to try to get through what they couldn’t possibly get through legislatively.
I’m still suspicious of the Supreme Court long after the Roger Taney court declared slaves as property. These deciders are just people not gods with black robes and people make decisions both good and not so good.
Nowadays, the same goes for a lot of the clergy. Consider the empty but multi-colored sack that made a point of irritating Trump right after his inauguration. The first major achievement of his second term was staying put and not stomping out of there.
But yes, I have wondered sometimes if we'd get better results from the bench if its occupants were ordered to wear swimming trunks instead of robes. Just like boots were made for walkin', robes were made for pretendin'.
I've a modest proposal for the Supreme Court. The next time one of these idiotic district court decisions (e.g. Boasberg) needs to be reversed, vacate every decision that judge has ever made as his decisions are clearly justified ideologically rather than legally. Basically pull his teeth by telling the world all his rulings can be ignored because he clearly does not follow the law anyway.
Problem is, that judge has made hundreds of not thousands of rulings most of which fall within the norms. We only hear lately of these egregious missteps and oversteps. Not every ruling is incorrect
Just apply a maple fly swatter to their nether regions.
Green and no more than quarter inch diameter J.R.
I was thinking of the ones emblazoned with the name Louisville Slugger or maybe Rawlings.