“The media has a decision to make on free speech. Either they support Slater and free speech or they are just a cartel of propagandists with press passes.”
In fact the once vaunted “fourth estate” has become this country’s most dangerous “fifth column”since they have devolved into the propaganda machine of the Marxist/Democrat/Hate America Party! How is it possible otherwise for DJT to get 95% negative coverage from these sock puppets?
It's just starting to be unprofitable for the MSM. The Trumpster team is looking to end the NGO/Non profit gravy train for the left. That will have a lasting effect since a lot of that money supports the twisted reporting of the left and the censorship of the right. When the gravy train slows to a trickle some will start changing their reporting kinda like Bill Maher. Move to the center and make money or move to the left and expire. It's an easy choice.
Hey there, I've known a lot of Democrats and not one of them was a Marxist or hated America. You might want to get out more and mingle, you know, escape the epistemic echo chamber, like this hilarious cavern of ceaseless Trump adoration. North Korea's Dear Leader can only dream of having such unquestioning minions.
Point taken. Most moderate Democrats are decent folks who are generally clueless about the folks who run the DNC and its affiliates. Why you ask, because they get their news from the legacy media who are in the tank for the Democrat Party which is quite Marxist at its core. The legacy media can ignore stories favorable to the GOP and Trump, they can flat out lie, or they can spin stories (think Gaza) to come to questionable conclusions. The net result is a moderate Democrat who has been inculcated with TDS due to all the negative information they are bombarded with. Trust me, I know many of these folks and as I said above, they are good people who I count as good friends. But sadly, they have been gaslighted for years and have no grasp of how evil the Democrat Party has become.
An interesting observation, not least because legacy media, "Marxist at its core," as you say, is desperately capitalistic in obtaining ad revenue. Also, I don't know your Democratic friends, of course, but most Dems — at least center-left Dems — positively detest legacy media for being so damn squishy. And TDS? I believe that means "Trump Degradation Syndrome." But what the hell, at least you can write in whole, grammatical sentences, a real rarity in your crowd.
Alas, I have been damned by faint praise. Aren't you the erudite one. Clearly, you do suffer from TDS based on your snide remarks. I do believe the legacy media is Marxist at its core based the issues they either support or denigrate. They defend CRT (a derivative of Critical Theory), DEI, BLM, and other hard core left wing causes. And for the legacy media being desperately capitalistic, how many of these media outlets were getting under the table monies via USAID?
I’ve known many many hundreds of people and quite a few were democrats. However, the ONLY people I’ve ever questioned their mental stability were democrats - especially the leftist Karens of COVID and the teachers pushing transgender sex change on grade schoolers. Not all covid sickos were dems but the absolutely extremist zombies were dems. All of the tranny supporters are dems. As a 'ceaseless Trump adoration' giver and an 'adoration addict' I can launch a few traits at you. For example, as a clueless dem, you probably don't understand the ceaseless adoration (I combined them for you) the Trump individual liberty devotees have for the Constitution that is now finally in sight for throttling our government that should be managed at our command, not by the dems' former leader, the babbling, drooling man that was sharpened and honed by Corn Pop. Donald Trump is the first man with the balls to fight for that. 80% of the Repubs in Congress don't have that hanging between their legs, but Trump does. I am devoted to that.
I don't know you or know what drives you, but if you are confused about what drives this audience then you have no clue what you are facing or who you are addressing.
Since we all LOVE free speech, feel free to attempt to challenge the collective intelligence of this audience, PMS Carpenter.
Don, you’re attracting the leftist trolls. They start nice, then flood your site with their BS.
What I won't do is go the his "PMC's Substack" and troll him as he is probably in desperate need to attract readers and commenters to bolster his ranking.
This is an attempt by the left (post-election) to copy the strategy of the right.
I know P.M., you are above the fray and I applaud you for reading this “hilarious cavern of ceaseless Trump adoration” as you put it. I read the NYT and WP for a laugh now and then too. As for the fact that you haven’t met any democrats who are Marxists, it’s a sampling error on your part. As for the America haters, have you seen any of the campus rioters? I bet they are all Biden/Harris voters.
I saw 5 times that many of YOUR rioters in Portland, Seattle, Minneapolis under your Pys-Ops scheme. The difference? YOUR rioters hate America and the J6 rioters were subjects of the fedsurrection. Pipe bomb? Kammie-toe Harris in the DNC HQ but won't admit to it.
You represent lies and propaganda - you are desperate - and we aren't fooled any longer.
Have you seen Only Fans? How much do girls make off of OnlyFans?
Google-OnlyFans creators can earn a wide range of income. Some top-tier creators earn over $5 million annually.
Grok-Top Earners: The top 10% of creators, predominantly female, earn significantly more, with some making $5,000–$100,000 per month or more. ‘Nuff said. Ever wonder how they can earn so much? Watch and find out.😒
This is why protection from censorship is so important
Assistant Minneapolis Police Chief Katie Blackwell made the classic mistake of suing a truth teller for defamation, namely the intrepid Liz Collin of Alpha News. In her book, They’re Lying: The Media, The Left, And The Death of George Floyd, and in her documentary, The Fall of Minneapolis, Collin claimed Blackwell may have lied on the witness stand by stating that Derek Chauvin’s use of force on George Floyd was improvised and unauthorized.
Blackwell did indeed lie in that trial, and that lie was largely responsible for Chauvin’s being found guilty. Why hasn’t there been a call for at least a retrial as a result of the courts ruling in the defamation case?
I watched the whole thing. The entire George Floyd case was the most blatant example of a kangaroo court that I have ever seen even eclipsing the fraudulent J6 committee. It was clear from the get-go that the police officers were never going to get a fair trial and the state of Minnesota and the city of Minneapolis now have a stain upon them that will never go away. The true criminals in this case are the mayor, police officials, the prosecutors, and the judiciary who all ignored the evidence and conspired to railroad these police officers.
One of the most tragic and horrific injustices ever perpetrated if you ask me, feeding a beast that would live on for years tearing this country apart.
Yes, we hate Fascistbook and what its censorship. And Google has lost its way and is no longer a reliable search engine. Twitter was horrible when it banned Trump and Elon's purchase of Twitter may have saved our republic. And 95% of the media chose the dark side.
Thanks, Don, for reminding us what happened and informing us of the significance of the efforts of Gail Slater.
And that 95% of media is going the way of the dodo bird...they'd already be extinct if it weren't for USAID, Soros and Big Pharma dollars propping it up.
There's some comfort in knowing that, and perhaps that's what makes them seem so crazy and desperate to take out Trump and MAGA with every "news"cast.
Yes, but don't underestimate the dodo birds learning from the right-wing segment a la the post from MS Carpenter above which shows he is an active Substack writer with all the condescending babble of the leftist 'elites' who think they are better - know more - than anyone - including God.
They are in transition and we must keep our eyes peeled. They will resurface in a new format.
Publishers can be held liable for what they print because they control the words that appear in their materials. The Big Tech censors claim they are not publishers, i.e., they can't be liable because they don't control what appears on their sites. - You see where this is going, don't you? - The non-publisher's liability protection is codified in Section 230. Join the club if you see an unresolvable logical conflict here. Google, TEDx and the others claim "We don't censor" and "We are not publishers" but every one of them controls content to advance or impede political discussion. It appears the Trump Team will demand change. Admit you are publishers controlling content and bear the liability or stop your censoring programs.
When I was younger, I would pretend to be a "Libertarian". Abortion on demand, legalize all drugs, no censorship of any writing or behavior. Your right to swing your fist stops at my nose.
Now I am 70....I believe abortion is murder. Even merely the de-criminalization of street drugs has destroyed a generation....and that some censorship is absolutely necessary.
I do not want to see pictures of naked young women as I scroll through Twitter.
Gosh, lots of comments about the poll! Y’all need to relax, it’s just supposed to be FUNNY, which it always is, and why the funny answer is always right. Funny poll today Don!
To: Grammarly: ‘Whom do we vote off the Mt to’ .... You underlined it and suggested ‘who’. I hate grammar Nazis, but I depend on you guys. Grok- -The correct word is whom, like the example you gave in the second sentence..."for whom did you vote?" Love their program; much, much better than spell check. Free. Grammarly.com
PLUS, The View was just incredibly irritating non-intelligent hostile toxic women screeching lies 100% of the time. Censoring them would be just cancelling the show. A lot like Rachel Maddow.
"X" should censor nothing. Free speech is free speech, whether you lke it or not. I play golf with a couple of guys who have TDS. I shrug off their anti Trump comments because it is their right to make the comments.
You have the self-confidence of being on the right side of common sense so you don’t need to defend yourself. Not so for the rabid left. They would cancel you if you didn’t stay quiet.
I wasn't going to post today because I had trouble with the poll. Then I got a notification from X/Twitter and i changed my mind. Elon could safely censor the Clintons, tyrannies, Maxine Waters and those idiotic polls... 'do you approve ...? ' and that would be ok in my book.
In fact, it's becoming extremely difficult to distinguish or discriminate one social media platform from another. Again IMHO they are all doing the same laundry.
Superior effort today and all good points. Censorship should be a sin.
One of the touchiest of subjects, this. I know far too many folks on "our" side of things, who would cheerfully chop off dissenting/different views at the knees. I have experienced it, as well - to the extent that yelling "You're going to HELL" at me because my particular spiritual Path is not the same as the yeller's. That doesn't even cover my political leanings...something I don't discuss with family members and a couple of my close friends, as some aren't as tolerant of folks having different opinions as I am.
As far as I am concerned, say anything, believe anything you want; I may or may not disagree, but I won't hold it against you; I retain the right to discuss it with you, or choose not to listen and walk away. Unless your position, spiritual or otherwise, can potentially bring harm to me, mine, or others, we won't have any issues.
"Can't we all just get along??" Wouldn't THAT be nice? Sadly, too many want to set conditions on that - basically the "My way or the highway" coalitions on BOTH sides.
<Le Sigh>
I am grateful for another day, in which, hopefully, I can annoy somebody who really, really deserves it - simply by being my usual cheerful self! ;D
“But to critics, including Washington’s many tech-industry lobbyists and allies, Trump is more motivated by his own personal grudges against tech companies that he thinks have wronged him”
Such “critics” might have a shred of credibility if they ever acknowledged the very real, very obvious censorship (and equally egregious misrepresentation) of Trump and conservative speech in general. In Big Tech, in media, in universities, etc. But they never do.
I was a paid subscriber to Bari Weiss’s substack for 3 years. The final year it became unreadable. She was always left with a big dose of pro Jew but at the beginning her stuff was nuanced and fair and a good place to get a reasonable leftist “take.” The quotes Don uses above are from the early years when she was fair-minded. I haven’t examined it through the lens of free speech so I can’t speak to that but in recent years her politics turned farther left and the nuance all but disappeared. She has a big case of TDS. I defend her right to her opinions but I won’t be paying to read them.
Mea culpa…a little. Just after writing this I read Bari Weiss’s Free Press article from yesterday “The most Important Speech of Trump’s Presidency.” It’s free for us non-payers. It’s good although I didn’t delve into the two accompanying articles, only what showed. The reader remarks are particularly good. That darned Bari, she’s made my blood boil so many times and then she has to go writing something good. But I’m still not paying.
I need to take back some of my comments recently on Trump's Department of Justice. When folks have criticized Pam Bondi, I have defended her (so far), saying that (1) it takes time to develop serious criminal cases, especially in the area of Treason, and (2) that the job of Attorney General is too big for one person--especially right now, trying to fix all the Dems damage--and that Trump needed to rapidly appoint several additional Deputy Attorney Generals to handle the work load. Those are still valid points.
But what I didn't realize, and what Don's column today makes clear, is that Trump has ALREADY BEEN DOING THAT-- and as usual, Trump is actually very much on top of this.
Don's column features Abigail Slater, Assistant Attorney General for the DOJ's Antitrust Division. It sounds like she is a firecracker doing a great job. He also quotes Politico, which states that at the Forum on Censorship that Slater just had, she also shared the mic with Brendan Carr, Trump's new Chairman of the FCC, and Andrew Ferguson, Trump's new Chairman of the FTC, who also sound like dynamic MAGA fighters.
Then add in recent news about Harmeet Dillon, who is Trump's new head of the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice, and Ed Martin (who was the Acting AG for DC, that Thom Tillis opposed) being appointed as the new Head of the DOJ's Weaponization Working Group, and Trump's appointment of Alina Habba as the Federal District Attorney for New Jersey.
There has not been as much media coverage of the lower-level appointments Trump has been making. But the reality is that Trump really is fielding a literal army of impressive crusaders to these divisions of the Department of Justice, to key federal District Attorney positions, and to many other agencies, commissions, etc.
This is flat out fantastic! And I was previously not well-enough informed.
“The media has a decision to make on free speech. Either they support Slater and free speech or they are just a cartel of propagandists with press passes.”
In fact the once vaunted “fourth estate” has become this country’s most dangerous “fifth column”since they have devolved into the propaganda machine of the Marxist/Democrat/Hate America Party! How is it possible otherwise for DJT to get 95% negative coverage from these sock puppets?
It's just starting to be unprofitable for the MSM. The Trumpster team is looking to end the NGO/Non profit gravy train for the left. That will have a lasting effect since a lot of that money supports the twisted reporting of the left and the censorship of the right. When the gravy train slows to a trickle some will start changing their reporting kinda like Bill Maher. Move to the center and make money or move to the left and expire. It's an easy choice.
28% picked OF- The view self-censors. No sentient being would ever watch it. It is free, so there's that.
Hey there, I've known a lot of Democrats and not one of them was a Marxist or hated America. You might want to get out more and mingle, you know, escape the epistemic echo chamber, like this hilarious cavern of ceaseless Trump adoration. North Korea's Dear Leader can only dream of having such unquestioning minions.
Point taken. Most moderate Democrats are decent folks who are generally clueless about the folks who run the DNC and its affiliates. Why you ask, because they get their news from the legacy media who are in the tank for the Democrat Party which is quite Marxist at its core. The legacy media can ignore stories favorable to the GOP and Trump, they can flat out lie, or they can spin stories (think Gaza) to come to questionable conclusions. The net result is a moderate Democrat who has been inculcated with TDS due to all the negative information they are bombarded with. Trust me, I know many of these folks and as I said above, they are good people who I count as good friends. But sadly, they have been gaslighted for years and have no grasp of how evil the Democrat Party has become.
An interesting observation, not least because legacy media, "Marxist at its core," as you say, is desperately capitalistic in obtaining ad revenue. Also, I don't know your Democratic friends, of course, but most Dems — at least center-left Dems — positively detest legacy media for being so damn squishy. And TDS? I believe that means "Trump Degradation Syndrome." But what the hell, at least you can write in whole, grammatical sentences, a real rarity in your crowd.
Alas, I have been damned by faint praise. Aren't you the erudite one. Clearly, you do suffer from TDS based on your snide remarks. I do believe the legacy media is Marxist at its core based the issues they either support or denigrate. They defend CRT (a derivative of Critical Theory), DEI, BLM, and other hard core left wing causes. And for the legacy media being desperately capitalistic, how many of these media outlets were getting under the table monies via USAID?
I’ve known many many hundreds of people and quite a few were democrats. However, the ONLY people I’ve ever questioned their mental stability were democrats - especially the leftist Karens of COVID and the teachers pushing transgender sex change on grade schoolers. Not all covid sickos were dems but the absolutely extremist zombies were dems. All of the tranny supporters are dems. As a 'ceaseless Trump adoration' giver and an 'adoration addict' I can launch a few traits at you. For example, as a clueless dem, you probably don't understand the ceaseless adoration (I combined them for you) the Trump individual liberty devotees have for the Constitution that is now finally in sight for throttling our government that should be managed at our command, not by the dems' former leader, the babbling, drooling man that was sharpened and honed by Corn Pop. Donald Trump is the first man with the balls to fight for that. 80% of the Repubs in Congress don't have that hanging between their legs, but Trump does. I am devoted to that.
I don't know you or know what drives you, but if you are confused about what drives this audience then you have no clue what you are facing or who you are addressing.
Since we all LOVE free speech, feel free to attempt to challenge the collective intelligence of this audience, PMS Carpenter.
Don, you’re attracting the leftist trolls. They start nice, then flood your site with their BS.
The troll is awol from the msm shit pile again. Please do not feed it Shrugged.
What I won't do is go the his "PMC's Substack" and troll him as he is probably in desperate need to attract readers and commenters to bolster his ranking.
This is an attempt by the left (post-election) to copy the strategy of the right.
I know P.M., you are above the fray and I applaud you for reading this “hilarious cavern of ceaseless Trump adoration” as you put it. I read the NYT and WP for a laugh now and then too. As for the fact that you haven’t met any democrats who are Marxists, it’s a sampling error on your part. As for the America haters, have you seen any of the campus rioters? I bet they are all Biden/Harris voters.
Well, I saw 1,500 America-hating rioters on 6 Jan 2021, nearly all now pardoned by Trump, including those who brutally beat police officers.
I saw 5 times that many of YOUR rioters in Portland, Seattle, Minneapolis under your Pys-Ops scheme. The difference? YOUR rioters hate America and the J6 rioters were subjects of the fedsurrection. Pipe bomb? Kammie-toe Harris in the DNC HQ but won't admit to it.
You represent lies and propaganda - you are desperate - and we aren't fooled any longer.
Go read Drudge and take a pill.
Guess you are the appointed "representative" from the Left to denigrate those here.
Bless your heart.
I didn’t take the poll today because I think Twitter shouldn’t censor anything .
Nor did I, same reason
Watch Only Fans, Cookie, and then get back to me.😇
Have you seen Only Fans? How much do girls make off of OnlyFans?
Google-OnlyFans creators can earn a wide range of income. Some top-tier creators earn over $5 million annually.
Grok-Top Earners: The top 10% of creators, predominantly female, earn significantly more, with some making $5,000–$100,000 per month or more. ‘Nuff said. Ever wonder how they can earn so much? Watch and find out.😒
I have not watched Fans Only. I have heard about it and what it is but I don’t watch that kind of stuff.
I’m not on any social media so…
(But I do think that there should be therapy or maybe deprograming for those who are addicted to it.)
This is social media.
No, it isn’t.
No Twix, no Facebook, and no TikTok. Makes for a happy person. No, I still haven't downloaded the Substack app either.
I’m 90% with you but:
(1) substack is social media
(2) Trump uses his Truth as a prime communication channel
We can’t ignore it. We can change it as we have changed politics ‘as usual’ - thanks to Trump, Truth Social, abd Don Surber.
Take this weapon out of the hands of the leftist lunatics. PMCarpenter needs some broader perspective.
I fell for the 'marvelous' substack app hype. I see very few advantages or upside. You're far far better off without.
Me too.
I didn't either
A worthless poll.
All things have a reason for occurring.
😡
I'd be happy if Twitter would censor Twitter.
That's already been done.
I kinda meant "all or nothing, and I'm not talking about nothing."
funny
I guess that Twitter censored your sense of humor.
😉
Yeah , I generally agree. BUT the View is in a category all by themselves.
This is why protection from censorship is so important
Assistant Minneapolis Police Chief Katie Blackwell made the classic mistake of suing a truth teller for defamation, namely the intrepid Liz Collin of Alpha News. In her book, They’re Lying: The Media, The Left, And The Death of George Floyd, and in her documentary, The Fall of Minneapolis, Collin claimed Blackwell may have lied on the witness stand by stating that Derek Chauvin’s use of force on George Floyd was improvised and unauthorized.
https://open.substack.com/pub/jackcashill/p/judge-police-brass-deceived-jury?r=h1q64&utm_medium=ios
https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2025/05/blackwells-folly-an-update.php
Blackwell did indeed lie in that trial, and that lie was largely responsible for Chauvin’s being found guilty. Why hasn’t there been a call for at least a retrial as a result of the courts ruling in the defamation case?
That is the question.
Pardon Derek, National Guard escorts him out of Muzziesota, and let Tampon Tim support the mostly peaceful rioters.
https://alphanews.org/opinion-chief-ohara-strikes-again-even-dumber/
This will break your heart…
https://youtu.be/3hXicIWVgk0
I watched the whole thing. The entire George Floyd case was the most blatant example of a kangaroo court that I have ever seen even eclipsing the fraudulent J6 committee. It was clear from the get-go that the police officers were never going to get a fair trial and the state of Minnesota and the city of Minneapolis now have a stain upon them that will never go away. The true criminals in this case are the mayor, police officials, the prosecutors, and the judiciary who all ignored the evidence and conspired to railroad these police officers.
One of the most tragic and horrific injustices ever perpetrated if you ask me, feeding a beast that would live on for years tearing this country apart.
Yes, we hate Fascistbook and what its censorship. And Google has lost its way and is no longer a reliable search engine. Twitter was horrible when it banned Trump and Elon's purchase of Twitter may have saved our republic. And 95% of the media chose the dark side.
Thanks, Don, for reminding us what happened and informing us of the significance of the efforts of Gail Slater.
And that 95% of media is going the way of the dodo bird...they'd already be extinct if it weren't for USAID, Soros and Big Pharma dollars propping it up.
There's some comfort in knowing that, and perhaps that's what makes them seem so crazy and desperate to take out Trump and MAGA with every "news"cast.
Yes, but don't underestimate the dodo birds learning from the right-wing segment a la the post from MS Carpenter above which shows he is an active Substack writer with all the condescending babble of the leftist 'elites' who think they are better - know more - than anyone - including God.
They are in transition and we must keep our eyes peeled. They will resurface in a new format.
Publishers can be held liable for what they print because they control the words that appear in their materials. The Big Tech censors claim they are not publishers, i.e., they can't be liable because they don't control what appears on their sites. - You see where this is going, don't you? - The non-publisher's liability protection is codified in Section 230. Join the club if you see an unresolvable logical conflict here. Google, TEDx and the others claim "We don't censor" and "We are not publishers" but every one of them controls content to advance or impede political discussion. It appears the Trump Team will demand change. Admit you are publishers controlling content and bear the liability or stop your censoring programs.
When I was younger, I would pretend to be a "Libertarian". Abortion on demand, legalize all drugs, no censorship of any writing or behavior. Your right to swing your fist stops at my nose.
Now I am 70....I believe abortion is murder. Even merely the de-criminalization of street drugs has destroyed a generation....and that some censorship is absolutely necessary.
I do not want to see pictures of naked young women as I scroll through Twitter.
I voted "Only Fans"......
55% of the shrubs haven't watched OF
Gosh, lots of comments about the poll! Y’all need to relax, it’s just supposed to be FUNNY, which it always is, and why the funny answer is always right. Funny poll today Don!
Thanks
To: Grammarly: ‘Whom do we vote off the Mt to’ .... You underlined it and suggested ‘who’. I hate grammar Nazis, but I depend on you guys. Grok- -The correct word is whom, like the example you gave in the second sentence..."for whom did you vote?" Love their program; much, much better than spell check. Free. Grammarly.com
Twitter must have censored everyone's sense of humor. I didn't know until now that there were so many cranky old farts here.
It took me nearly 80 years to get this cranky so I earned it.
PLUS, The View was just incredibly irritating non-intelligent hostile toxic women screeching lies 100% of the time. Censoring them would be just cancelling the show. A lot like Rachel Maddow.
We dotards prefer choleric. Sends those in Rio Linda to Grok😒.
Fart Smells and What They Mean: Metal, Sweet, and More (VIDEO)
Politico, LOL. Probably the most irrelevant website on the planet.
Funny how they missed a payroll as soon as the USAID shut down.
Call me crazy, but it's a dream of mine that we also hold the decision-makers in the intelligence agencies responsible.
"X" should censor nothing. Free speech is free speech, whether you lke it or not. I play golf with a couple of guys who have TDS. I shrug off their anti Trump comments because it is their right to make the comments.
You have the self-confidence of being on the right side of common sense so you don’t need to defend yourself. Not so for the rabid left. They would cancel you if you didn’t stay quiet.
"Arguing with a fool proves there are two".
'Never argue with a fool. Onlookers may not be able to tell the difference'.
Wrestling a pig is down and dirty per Honest Abe.
'The Pig Got Up and Slowly Walked Away'
I wasn't going to post today because I had trouble with the poll. Then I got a notification from X/Twitter and i changed my mind. Elon could safely censor the Clintons, tyrannies, Maxine Waters and those idiotic polls... 'do you approve ...? ' and that would be ok in my book.
In fact, it's becoming extremely difficult to distinguish or discriminate one social media platform from another. Again IMHO they are all doing the same laundry.
Superior effort today and all good points. Censorship should be a sin.
Good morning, all.
One of the touchiest of subjects, this. I know far too many folks on "our" side of things, who would cheerfully chop off dissenting/different views at the knees. I have experienced it, as well - to the extent that yelling "You're going to HELL" at me because my particular spiritual Path is not the same as the yeller's. That doesn't even cover my political leanings...something I don't discuss with family members and a couple of my close friends, as some aren't as tolerant of folks having different opinions as I am.
As far as I am concerned, say anything, believe anything you want; I may or may not disagree, but I won't hold it against you; I retain the right to discuss it with you, or choose not to listen and walk away. Unless your position, spiritual or otherwise, can potentially bring harm to me, mine, or others, we won't have any issues.
"Can't we all just get along??" Wouldn't THAT be nice? Sadly, too many want to set conditions on that - basically the "My way or the highway" coalitions on BOTH sides.
<Le Sigh>
I am grateful for another day, in which, hopefully, I can annoy somebody who really, really deserves it - simply by being my usual cheerful self! ;D
Have a great day, everyone.
Ha! All well said.
Great points all and bless you for your take on life Kv.
“But to critics, including Washington’s many tech-industry lobbyists and allies, Trump is more motivated by his own personal grudges against tech companies that he thinks have wronged him”
Such “critics” might have a shred of credibility if they ever acknowledged the very real, very obvious censorship (and equally egregious misrepresentation) of Trump and conservative speech in general. In Big Tech, in media, in universities, etc. But they never do.
You sure Slater’s real name isn’t Slayer? The fake news and high tech cartel are about to get sliced and diced. Pass the popcorn 🍿
I was a paid subscriber to Bari Weiss’s substack for 3 years. The final year it became unreadable. She was always left with a big dose of pro Jew but at the beginning her stuff was nuanced and fair and a good place to get a reasonable leftist “take.” The quotes Don uses above are from the early years when she was fair-minded. I haven’t examined it through the lens of free speech so I can’t speak to that but in recent years her politics turned farther left and the nuance all but disappeared. She has a big case of TDS. I defend her right to her opinions but I won’t be paying to read them.
Mea culpa…a little. Just after writing this I read Bari Weiss’s Free Press article from yesterday “The most Important Speech of Trump’s Presidency.” It’s free for us non-payers. It’s good although I didn’t delve into the two accompanying articles, only what showed. The reader remarks are particularly good. That darned Bari, she’s made my blood boil so many times and then she has to go writing something good. But I’m still not paying.
I need to take back some of my comments recently on Trump's Department of Justice. When folks have criticized Pam Bondi, I have defended her (so far), saying that (1) it takes time to develop serious criminal cases, especially in the area of Treason, and (2) that the job of Attorney General is too big for one person--especially right now, trying to fix all the Dems damage--and that Trump needed to rapidly appoint several additional Deputy Attorney Generals to handle the work load. Those are still valid points.
But what I didn't realize, and what Don's column today makes clear, is that Trump has ALREADY BEEN DOING THAT-- and as usual, Trump is actually very much on top of this.
Don's column features Abigail Slater, Assistant Attorney General for the DOJ's Antitrust Division. It sounds like she is a firecracker doing a great job. He also quotes Politico, which states that at the Forum on Censorship that Slater just had, she also shared the mic with Brendan Carr, Trump's new Chairman of the FCC, and Andrew Ferguson, Trump's new Chairman of the FTC, who also sound like dynamic MAGA fighters.
Then add in recent news about Harmeet Dillon, who is Trump's new head of the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice, and Ed Martin (who was the Acting AG for DC, that Thom Tillis opposed) being appointed as the new Head of the DOJ's Weaponization Working Group, and Trump's appointment of Alina Habba as the Federal District Attorney for New Jersey.
There has not been as much media coverage of the lower-level appointments Trump has been making. But the reality is that Trump really is fielding a literal army of impressive crusaders to these divisions of the Department of Justice, to key federal District Attorney positions, and to many other agencies, commissions, etc.
This is flat out fantastic! And I was previously not well-enough informed.
You are so right about what is happening but the public gets msm lying by omission TPG.