Impeachment and removal of a Federal judge is nigh onto impossible. The process is similar to impeaching a sitting President. There is no way two thirds of the current Senate are going to vote to remove Judge Talwani despite the fact that she deserves removal. The best strategy moving forward is to never elect a Democrat president again. I know that sounds crazy, but Obama and Biden gave us a bunch of ideological jurists who couldn't care less about the law or the Constitution.
There is something "HUGE" behind Epstein. Trump, Patel, and Bongino are not ones to back away, but there is something about this case that makes it untouchable.
I think possibly more powerful than POTUS, if a few entities are in league w each other, yes. Certain rogue operatives with powerful corporate and even foreign interests? Only DJT and his closest team would know for sure.
Imagine what could be accomplished for the American people if the Democrats just stopped. Stopped opposing everything. Stop these ridiculous distractions that come from these district court “judges”. They are not judges. They are activists in black robes.
So far everything Trump is doing is working. Just stop opposing for the sake of this country.
I read an article last night talking about how Democrat constituents are insisting that their elected representatives do ANYTHING they must to stop Trump, even to take actions that would get them shot or wounded. So I think they have given up on getting the Right to go “postal” and are insisting that politicians sacrifice themselves to start the Revolution. If said politicians had any backbone, they would tell them that’s not the way a “democracy” works, but of course they don’t. They want to appease them because they want to get reelected. And it shows you how little regard these constituents have for human life and how basically they are already little tyrants. This is serious and I wish someone would do something to disrupt these activist networks and organizations (follow the money). I think a lot about the historical backdrop of Dr. Zhivago. Things will get SO MUCH worse if these communists get their way.
They can't win on issues so this is their only impactful alternative. They can't win in the realm of logic and ideas, so they bully people.
If the Republicans attempted to do half of what the Dems do on a regular basis - without a peep out of anyone except for truly conservative sources - the media would cause so much turmoil our no-backbone Congress would cave.
From what I read about Dem reps experiences with their constituents at home, the Left/Dems want blood, literally. "Resistance" judges are mild versus what these folks want.
The answer (which won't happen) would be for the Dem "leadership" to band together and endorse civility, our precious "democratic norms", free speech etc etc. They won't do that b/c they are cowards and also love power. The environment rewards extremes.
Pray for our country, and for Pres Trump. Dangerous times.
Communists never stop opposing or agitating. They will never give up until they have fomented civil war. And they certainly couldn’t care less about “democracy” or our Constitution.
WWDD? What would democrats do? Dox her and her family and pets; send dog whistle codes to trigger deranged nuts to kill or kidnap her; 24 hour a day protests on her street; call and turn off her utilities; sign her up for Starlink service; send her MyPillows; call in that her CCs had been stolen; get the Boston DA that prosecuted the Amiraults for kindergardener testimony on sexual abuse to charge her too….the list from Boston newspaper articles the last is endless…
You forgot swatting - the life-threatening tactic of anonymously calling the cops to report a murder suicide in progress so the cops show up in swat gear, guns aimed, and ready to shoot the home owner if s/he looks like they are making a move to reach of something. It is a horrible practice that has been done many dozens of times to conservative families.
Dorothy Rabinowitz and the Amiraults witch-hunt with the prosecution tampered victims Stephen King-like sex-Clown premise, distinguished herself uncovering the fantasy hysteria that MA prosecutors saw as tickets to higher office…
Of course lefty Wikipedia and WSJ work by Dorothy from the 1980s is nowhere t/b found, and AI summarizes the huge volume of speculative Covid-like reporting that they were guilty as charged…despite all those pesky unearthed Facts. Not sure if they ever got out of prison….
I have been an attorney in private practice for 36 years. I am not a trial lawyer, yet I am embarrassed and astonished at what the judiciary has devolved into. If the Supreme Court does not act, then disbarment is the best solution.
Just one of the problems with that effort is the fact that the majority of these Bar Associations are just as Left-leaning as the judges.
While there is the power within Congress to impeach it is not only a hugely time consuming effort, plus a diversion from their equally pressing matters, and with no guarantee of success, sadly, there are few simple or quick fixes to address the behavior of these judges and their egregious rulings except via SCOTUS, a fact which these rogue judges and devious plaintiffs are fully cognizant of.
It is a diabolical delay tactic, “process as punishment”, whereby they’ve turned the Rule of Law into the law of rule.
Just maybe this is the time to use the power of persuasion aka indictment for theft of services,ie knowingly issuing an invalid order. Maybe just wishful thinking but surely PDJT or one of his aides can find a way to end this shit short of hiring HRC.
Another long time attorney here. I’m not convinced that disbarring a Federal judge would result in removal. The Constitution does not require a Federal judge to be a lawyer, licensed or otherwise. I’d bet there would be lots of litigation before removal would occur. Another avenue with potential would be some as yet untried process whereby Congress or the Executive branch finds that this judge has violated the Constitutional requirement of “good behavior.”
That would be their most viable avenue to pursue, but, again, still requires an impeachment process, hugely time consuming, never been tried before and difficult to prove, with no guarantee of success, especially with such a slim majority margin in Congress.
Suzie, I agree. The untried process I imagine would appear much like legislation. It would begin like bill in the House finding a judge “misbehaved,” then the legislation would be passed on to the Senate for a similar finding which would be passed by a majority vote and then submitted to the President for signing. Such a process could survive a challenge of “due process.” While there is no precedent for this and the process would certainly be appealed to the courts, the “good behavior” language in the Constitution must have some meaning and something like this could survive.
Even the definition of “good behavior” is historically debated. It would be a slog, any way you paint it. We don’t have the luxury of time, and distracting this slim, pesky Congress from their more pressing and vital duties, I feel, would be a mistake, and a gift to Democrats.
I tend to agree, but starting some “process” in the House other than a hopeless impeachment seems preferable to doing nothing and it might just get the attention of the rogue judges. However I also tend to think they are already so far out of line they can’t possibly give a damn what anyone thinks about their behavior. Maybe they might just fear giving Trump the opportunity to fill the vacancy created by their misbehavior. I can always pray.
It’s never happened but since the Constitution (Art. 3) sets the Federal judges’ term of office as “during good behavior” the framers must have imagined some type of bad behavior.
Wasn't there a president who just shit-canned a whole tier of judges? Jefferson?? I don't quite remember but know it was a long time ago and the president was a no BS kinda guy who just said to hell with all of them and removed an entire bench. That's what needs to happen.
You’re getting into some serious history here. I think you’re referring to the “Midnight Judges” that John Adams appointed on the eve of Jefferson’s assumption of office. I doubt that is comparable to anything happening now because it involved court reorganization legislation signed by Adams and repealed after Jefferson took office. In any event I’m not informed enough to comment other than to say I “think” that what you recall and I don’t think it’s comparable. 😉
Pull a card from “Old Hickory” Andrew Jackson’s deck - ignore her & the ruling. The SC has already spoken on this. Who the hell does this woman think she is? This really is a tyranny of the judiciary. These people are unhinged lunatics goaded on by an edu establishment in the pocket of the Left. Moreover, this is what the Confederates pulled in 1861; nullify laws they don’t like/agree with then make up their own. If things don’t go their way they change the rules mid-game & expect everybody to go along with it. Bravo Sierra.
These people need to be made an example of & publicly humiliated.
As of today I’m not sure what country we live in. Judges make up 💩 and the FBI and DOJ are okay with people abusing children to the point of death. If we as a people allow this we deserve Hell as retribution. Lying has become a national pastime.
It’s time to take a page from history and bring back shunning for those who refuse to conform to societal norms. Of course that would look different than past cultures, but would certainly begin with loss of employability. Add in loss of all credit and possibly even ID history.
If they choose to not be part of civilized society, let’s make sure they do it completely.
Just an aside, the Democrats themselves have already brought back "shunning", in that they just shut down and avoid people (even family members) who disagree with them.
I think Republicans generally tend to be more confident in their individual beliefs, so shunning can hurt, but it doesn't affect a Republican's beliefs. But on the Left, they do not have the internal resources (spirituality, etc.) to endure under shunning, as they are much more psychologically reliant on being "approved by the group" and retaining their membership in the Democratic "tribe". So they THINK shunning is an effective tool, but it is not actually so effective on Republicans.
But I realize my comment is peripheral, because the shunning you're describing is alot more than just social. What you're describing could amount to outright discrimination based on political beliefs, which would not be a good direction for our society to go in.
Being psychologically reliant on group approval is why shunning is an effective tool — for them; they can’t cope hearing other opinions or being questioned. Cancel culture was a way of “shunning”. Thank God for Musk putting a stop to that! And since he did, the right has been speaking out and speaking up. That’s good! I just wonder if using things leftists are saying for material on television or radio is a good idea or if it would be better if they were ignored, a non-discriminatory and healthier type of shunning. Then I think, “But we need to know what they are saying and what they are up to.” Just don’t want us to feed the beast, so to speak.
This thing posing as a judge needs to be charged with fraud if she got paid during her issuance of the order. She knows it will not stand and is thus fraudulent in her actions imho. On another point pray someone like her is not on the bench to try the antifa perps arrested in Alvarado ,Tex.
We have this insurrectionist judge, Gov Newsom, and Gov Mills (Maine) outright ignoring Federal law. They are spitting in the faces of a majority of American voters.
Pam Bondi? Where the hell are you on the Newsom and Mills ignoring of men in women's sports?
If Congress is too timid to confront this insurrectionist judge, we need to address it through the DOJ.
How can a sitting judge issue an illegal order from the bench? Isn't that a crime as bad as any committed by those she has sentenced in her career?
Thanks for the reminder but I just saw Newsome just released a statement that he is holding firm and ignoring Federal law.
It is time for Bondi to pull out the big guns and tear someone to shreds in the public forum. Men is women's sports is a winning hand for Bondi - if she has the guts and skillset to take it.
The DOJ is, in my opinion, like a Yorkshire terrier nipping at the ankles of the likes of Newsom et al. The Rottweiler in this scenario is the Treasury withholding Federal dollars until these miscreants start following Federal law. And let's face it, California is swimming in red ink and needs the cash. I am sure Maine needs it as well.
the two top priorities of the left are their most monstrous: genocide (now expanding beyond abortion to include the elderly and disabled in "medically assisted dying") and the sociopathic sexual depravity that is inevitable when sex is removed from its biological context. it's no wonder they disregard rule of law, attack law enforcement officers, vandalize, riot, and call for normal people to be murdered given that contempt for humanity.
Thune and Johnson should point out that she has no power in the matter and tell her to sit down and shut up.
Thune and Johnson are part of the Eunuch class. They do nothing because they have no balls…
Not in their character. There’s something to be said for sock puppets. And it shouldn’t have to always be Trump’s hand up …..
Seems the hand up the hoo-ha usually belongs to Barry's owners.
Why doesn’t Trump tell Bondi to do exactly that?
Apparently she said some things that aren't adding up that would preclude her from commenting at the present time. Cheez seriously?
I am not sure but is Judge Talwani an Obama appointee?
I heard somewhere she is.
LOL !
😂
Your question should have read "... Judge Talwani is an Obama Appointee".
There must be SOME process to remove a JUDGE that is not following the law!
The left is trying madly to bait DJT into not following the law but I know he’s smarter than they are.
Fed.D.A. perhaps charge her with sedition which is as powerful as her order.
Exactly. Couldn’t Trump arrest her for interfering with his lawful duty to enforce the law?
Ewwwww! I LIKE IT!!👍👍
Impeachment and removal of a Federal judge is nigh onto impossible. The process is similar to impeaching a sitting President. There is no way two thirds of the current Senate are going to vote to remove Judge Talwani despite the fact that she deserves removal. The best strategy moving forward is to never elect a Democrat president again. I know that sounds crazy, but Obama and Biden gave us a bunch of ideological jurists who couldn't care less about the law or the Constitution.
I like Marian’s suggestion above:
“Fed.D.A. perhaps charge her with sedition which is as powerful as her order.”
Aided by the RINO'S ; if that's not betraying your constituency I don't know what is 😡 .
Maybe we could get Blondie to wax poetic how tough she will be on another DEI hire judge. But then again she is pretty busy lying about Epstein...
There is something "HUGE" behind Epstein. Trump, Patel, and Bongino are not ones to back away, but there is something about this case that makes it untouchable.
Arkancide come to mind.
Or details of former Presidents pedophilia…IDK though Billy and Joey are already on the lower rungs of the morality ladder.
HiLlARy probably rode the Lolita express more often than worthless Willie.
I wouldn’t disagree. Amoral biache.
More powerful than the POTUS?
Something really really big and evil. There are some really bad actors in this world. People who could stop the world from spinning.
It ain't over yet , PDJT will not squander the opportunity . He's will release when returns can be maximized .
I think possibly more powerful than POTUS, if a few entities are in league w each other, yes. Certain rogue operatives with powerful corporate and even foreign interests? Only DJT and his closest team would know for sure.
I can see that in theory. I don't think Trump concedes power to anyone, at least without a fight.
I agree that DJT NEVER surrenders. But I can picture him strategizing. ‘Live to fight another day’ sort of thing.
What law isn’t Trump following?
None. Thats my point.
He's smart enough to color within the law so they cannot ‘get’ him.
There should be a periodic review of each Judge's decisions with punishment for straying from the Constitution .
Imagine what could be accomplished for the American people if the Democrats just stopped. Stopped opposing everything. Stop these ridiculous distractions that come from these district court “judges”. They are not judges. They are activists in black robes.
So far everything Trump is doing is working. Just stop opposing for the sake of this country.
Yes, that was also the case in his first term.
It is amazing to me HOW MUCH $#@&% the right has put up with and still not gone ‘postal’ on the left.
I read an article last night talking about how Democrat constituents are insisting that their elected representatives do ANYTHING they must to stop Trump, even to take actions that would get them shot or wounded. So I think they have given up on getting the Right to go “postal” and are insisting that politicians sacrifice themselves to start the Revolution. If said politicians had any backbone, they would tell them that’s not the way a “democracy” works, but of course they don’t. They want to appease them because they want to get reelected. And it shows you how little regard these constituents have for human life and how basically they are already little tyrants. This is serious and I wish someone would do something to disrupt these activist networks and organizations (follow the money). I think a lot about the historical backdrop of Dr. Zhivago. Things will get SO MUCH worse if these communists get their way.
https://archive.is/nzQ3K
Dr. Tar and Professor Feather…
They can't win on issues so this is their only impactful alternative. They can't win in the realm of logic and ideas, so they bully people.
If the Republicans attempted to do half of what the Dems do on a regular basis - without a peep out of anyone except for truly conservative sources - the media would cause so much turmoil our no-backbone Congress would cave.
From what I read about Dem reps experiences with their constituents at home, the Left/Dems want blood, literally. "Resistance" judges are mild versus what these folks want.
The answer (which won't happen) would be for the Dem "leadership" to band together and endorse civility, our precious "democratic norms", free speech etc etc. They won't do that b/c they are cowards and also love power. The environment rewards extremes.
Pray for our country, and for Pres Trump. Dangerous times.
Communists never stop opposing or agitating. They will never give up until they have fomented civil war. And they certainly couldn’t care less about “democracy” or our Constitution.
WWDD? What would democrats do? Dox her and her family and pets; send dog whistle codes to trigger deranged nuts to kill or kidnap her; 24 hour a day protests on her street; call and turn off her utilities; sign her up for Starlink service; send her MyPillows; call in that her CCs had been stolen; get the Boston DA that prosecuted the Amiraults for kindergardener testimony on sexual abuse to charge her too….the list from Boston newspaper articles the last is endless…
You forgot swatting - the life-threatening tactic of anonymously calling the cops to report a murder suicide in progress so the cops show up in swat gear, guns aimed, and ready to shoot the home owner if s/he looks like they are making a move to reach of something. It is a horrible practice that has been done many dozens of times to conservative families.
Dorothy Rabinowitz and the Amiraults witch-hunt with the prosecution tampered victims Stephen King-like sex-Clown premise, distinguished herself uncovering the fantasy hysteria that MA prosecutors saw as tickets to higher office…
Of course lefty Wikipedia and WSJ work by Dorothy from the 1980s is nowhere t/b found, and AI summarizes the huge volume of speculative Covid-like reporting that they were guilty as charged…despite all those pesky unearthed Facts. Not sure if they ever got out of prison….
https://www.cltg.org/cltg/amirault/Rabinowitz99-08-24.htm
Have Auntie Bev be the judge in endless trials of cases against her…
Cactus - You have some wonderful ideas!
Don,
I have been an attorney in private practice for 36 years. I am not a trial lawyer, yet I am embarrassed and astonished at what the judiciary has devolved into. If the Supreme Court does not act, then disbarment is the best solution.
Just one of the problems with that effort is the fact that the majority of these Bar Associations are just as Left-leaning as the judges.
While there is the power within Congress to impeach it is not only a hugely time consuming effort, plus a diversion from their equally pressing matters, and with no guarantee of success, sadly, there are few simple or quick fixes to address the behavior of these judges and their egregious rulings except via SCOTUS, a fact which these rogue judges and devious plaintiffs are fully cognizant of.
It is a diabolical delay tactic, “process as punishment”, whereby they’ve turned the Rule of Law into the law of rule.
Just maybe this is the time to use the power of persuasion aka indictment for theft of services,ie knowingly issuing an invalid order. Maybe just wishful thinking but surely PDJT or one of his aides can find a way to end this shit short of hiring HRC.
Another long time attorney here. I’m not convinced that disbarring a Federal judge would result in removal. The Constitution does not require a Federal judge to be a lawyer, licensed or otherwise. I’d bet there would be lots of litigation before removal would occur. Another avenue with potential would be some as yet untried process whereby Congress or the Executive branch finds that this judge has violated the Constitutional requirement of “good behavior.”
That would be their most viable avenue to pursue, but, again, still requires an impeachment process, hugely time consuming, never been tried before and difficult to prove, with no guarantee of success, especially with such a slim majority margin in Congress.
Suzie, I agree. The untried process I imagine would appear much like legislation. It would begin like bill in the House finding a judge “misbehaved,” then the legislation would be passed on to the Senate for a similar finding which would be passed by a majority vote and then submitted to the President for signing. Such a process could survive a challenge of “due process.” While there is no precedent for this and the process would certainly be appealed to the courts, the “good behavior” language in the Constitution must have some meaning and something like this could survive.
Even the definition of “good behavior” is historically debated. It would be a slog, any way you paint it. We don’t have the luxury of time, and distracting this slim, pesky Congress from their more pressing and vital duties, I feel, would be a mistake, and a gift to Democrats.
I tend to agree, but starting some “process” in the House other than a hopeless impeachment seems preferable to doing nothing and it might just get the attention of the rogue judges. However I also tend to think they are already so far out of line they can’t possibly give a damn what anyone thinks about their behavior. Maybe they might just fear giving Trump the opportunity to fill the vacancy created by their misbehavior. I can always pray.
That’s always my go-to: prayer!
“God’s ways are not our ways, nor His thoughts our thoughts…”
He could come up with something no one ever dreamed of - He usually does.
👍😉
So they could give her time off for bad behavior?
It’s never happened but since the Constitution (Art. 3) sets the Federal judges’ term of office as “during good behavior” the framers must have imagined some type of bad behavior.
Just so you know, my comment was a joke. Lame, maybe, but a joke nonetheless.
Misprision of office ? Or perhaps violation of the oath given before taking office .
Wasn't there a president who just shit-canned a whole tier of judges? Jefferson?? I don't quite remember but know it was a long time ago and the president was a no BS kinda guy who just said to hell with all of them and removed an entire bench. That's what needs to happen.
You’re getting into some serious history here. I think you’re referring to the “Midnight Judges” that John Adams appointed on the eve of Jefferson’s assumption of office. I doubt that is comparable to anything happening now because it involved court reorganization legislation signed by Adams and repealed after Jefferson took office. In any event I’m not informed enough to comment other than to say I “think” that what you recall and I don’t think it’s comparable. 😉
Pull a card from “Old Hickory” Andrew Jackson’s deck - ignore her & the ruling. The SC has already spoken on this. Who the hell does this woman think she is? This really is a tyranny of the judiciary. These people are unhinged lunatics goaded on by an edu establishment in the pocket of the Left. Moreover, this is what the Confederates pulled in 1861; nullify laws they don’t like/agree with then make up their own. If things don’t go their way they change the rules mid-game & expect everybody to go along with it. Bravo Sierra.
These people need to be made an example of & publicly humiliated.
And then defend said district based on performance ; or lack of .
Defund not defend .
Well, since she’s in Boston, we could toss her in the harbor, tied to a crate of heavy tea…
"To delay is to deny..." That is precisely the point. Lawfare.
As of today I’m not sure what country we live in. Judges make up 💩 and the FBI and DOJ are okay with people abusing children to the point of death. If we as a people allow this we deserve Hell as retribution. Lying has become a national pastime.
It’s time to take a page from history and bring back shunning for those who refuse to conform to societal norms. Of course that would look different than past cultures, but would certainly begin with loss of employability. Add in loss of all credit and possibly even ID history.
If they choose to not be part of civilized society, let’s make sure they do it completely.
Just an aside, the Democrats themselves have already brought back "shunning", in that they just shut down and avoid people (even family members) who disagree with them.
I think Republicans generally tend to be more confident in their individual beliefs, so shunning can hurt, but it doesn't affect a Republican's beliefs. But on the Left, they do not have the internal resources (spirituality, etc.) to endure under shunning, as they are much more psychologically reliant on being "approved by the group" and retaining their membership in the Democratic "tribe". So they THINK shunning is an effective tool, but it is not actually so effective on Republicans.
But I realize my comment is peripheral, because the shunning you're describing is alot more than just social. What you're describing could amount to outright discrimination based on political beliefs, which would not be a good direction for our society to go in.
Being psychologically reliant on group approval is why shunning is an effective tool — for them; they can’t cope hearing other opinions or being questioned. Cancel culture was a way of “shunning”. Thank God for Musk putting a stop to that! And since he did, the right has been speaking out and speaking up. That’s good! I just wonder if using things leftists are saying for material on television or radio is a good idea or if it would be better if they were ignored, a non-discriminatory and healthier type of shunning. Then I think, “But we need to know what they are saying and what they are up to.” Just don’t want us to feed the beast, so to speak.
This thing posing as a judge needs to be charged with fraud if she got paid during her issuance of the order. She knows it will not stand and is thus fraudulent in her actions imho. On another point pray someone like her is not on the bench to try the antifa perps arrested in Alvarado ,Tex.
Interesting point-- the personal finances of these judges could indeed reveal effective avenues for attacking them.
Trump should just pull an Andrew Jackson and issue an EO, "District Judge Talwani has made her decision, now let her enforce it."
I have nothing but contempt for the Guardians of Decay. They need to be humiliated and shamed at every opportunity.
We have this insurrectionist judge, Gov Newsom, and Gov Mills (Maine) outright ignoring Federal law. They are spitting in the faces of a majority of American voters.
Pam Bondi? Where the hell are you on the Newsom and Mills ignoring of men in women's sports?
If Congress is too timid to confront this insurrectionist judge, we need to address it through the DOJ.
How can a sitting judge issue an illegal order from the bench? Isn't that a crime as bad as any committed by those she has sentenced in her career?
The DOJ has filed suit and is going after CA and ME for those things.
Thanks for the reminder but I just saw Newsome just released a statement that he is holding firm and ignoring Federal law.
It is time for Bondi to pull out the big guns and tear someone to shreds in the public forum. Men is women's sports is a winning hand for Bondi - if she has the guts and skillset to take it.
The DOJ is, in my opinion, like a Yorkshire terrier nipping at the ankles of the likes of Newsom et al. The Rottweiler in this scenario is the Treasury withholding Federal dollars until these miscreants start following Federal law. And let's face it, California is swimming in red ink and needs the cash. I am sure Maine needs it as well.
This will only work if the Feds follow through on threats.
The Dems daily beclown themselves. It’s like watching a slow motion 100-car accident on I-10.
the two top priorities of the left are their most monstrous: genocide (now expanding beyond abortion to include the elderly and disabled in "medically assisted dying") and the sociopathic sexual depravity that is inevitable when sex is removed from its biological context. it's no wonder they disregard rule of law, attack law enforcement officers, vandalize, riot, and call for normal people to be murdered given that contempt for humanity.
Hmmm, from her actions I have deduced that judge Talwani is an Obama appointee.