213 Comments
User's avatar
William Coulter's avatar

The answer to today’s poll is none of the above.

They are all terrible examples of “success “ in their own minds.

Don Surber's avatar

I had to vote for Angel. She is the funniest basketball player in the world. Her inability to make a layup is legendary. Clips of her missing shot after shot have taken over my Twitter feed as have her iconic no-look passes -- to the other team.

Greg's avatar

LOL. Another reason why no one watches WNBA.

AZCACTUSPETE's avatar

I went to one WNBA game and could not stand the CLATTER... way too much noise and not a single second where you could talk with the person sitting next to you. That goes for baseball games as well; and football; "they" (the powers that be) tend to think that we fans need to be 100% entertained 100% of the time. NOT!!!!... Give us our space and that means our visual and audio space. As for the NBA, it is worse.

Greg's avatar

I'll take your word for it. Don't go to public spectacles anymore. Too expensive and not fun.

AZCACTUSPETE's avatar

I go to "some"; not like I used to. Less and less as the years go by. I am not in their demographic set anyway; too old; and I don't buy their gear; so they don't care about me and, therefore, I don't care about them (the sports, the owners, the players, etc.).

Brian LeMay's avatar

Agree ; I am aware that pro sports generates a lot of money but have my doubts about any positive effects it has on our society .

Marlan Hoerer's avatar

You suffered what I avoid AZ and I thank you for the validation.

revmaddog1948's avatar

I watch the NBA but only one team the Indiana fever and forgive me for not capitalizing fever I'm sure you know why but it's not just Caitlin Clark watching the NBA now is like watching a hockey game only in hockey you watch the price of a hockey game breaks out whereas the NBA is more like baseball where if you watch long enough sooner or later both dugouts are going to get emptied. I don't watch sports straight through unless somebody like my Charles Xavier ex son-in-law calls up and I have yet to watch an NBA game for the beginning to the end but I know there's interest now because Caitlin Clark has been compared to Stephen Curry and I did used to watch his games until time and politics just interfered but YouTube has saved them all. That's all folks!

Retirednottired's avatar

Commas are a very useful item.

Estelle Chisholm's avatar

I have heard of "runaway" sentences, but this is the first one I have seen in a long time! Good grief! Try punctuation, PLEASE!

revmaddog1948's avatar

My daughter's wine wine w h i n e I'm tired of yelling at my secretary whenever I'm in a manic mood because when I get happy I start laughing loudly and then everybody's embarrassed and I have run on sentences without letting them know that there was a subject change so my word to you is if you are overly concerned about pronunciation and commas, learn to live with it. Later Gators.

Tanto Minchiata's avatar

Angel puts the "W" in WNBA. The "W" in "WNBA" stands for "Whiny".

William Coulter's avatar

Those are called me bounds I think .

She gets her own rebound and it counts as a rebound.

Suzie's avatar

I think that’s exactly why they keep her on the team: it’s the only way they can anyone to watch!

VICKI's avatar

I didn't even know what an Angel was. I wanted to say MO but of course she would be in the same arrogant and no nothing categirt as Kamala Harris. Crockett and Mam;what's his name would give America a new look...trashy ghetto among other descriptive words.

Doug's avatar

"Legends in their own minds". That's why I voted for Jizzy!! LOL

T L Ponick's avatar

Agree. Can’t vote for any of these intellectual and political non- geniuses. Kinda reminds me of the Soros-funded Northern Virginia populace these days. All bought and paid for pols around here. (Sigh.)

Indydoc's avatar

fully agree, couldn't get myself to vote on that poll

Lawsy0's avatar

That is exactly why I picked Lizzo. She may or may not be presidential timber, but she lost about 200 pounds; while I don't usually follow rock stars except while under the hair dryer at the beauty salon. NYT nor WSJ is not usually in the magazine rack. But People magazine is.

VICKI's avatar

NYT isn't that Bezos and WSJ has gone wokish/Trump bashing, so I canceled that subscription and Lizzo is no "star" ...she is to me the same as a rapper so I voted for her since she was the only one really not "political" just to vote (as a joke).

Lawsy0's avatar

Right you are; sometimes it is easier to laugh than to cry; besides it takes fewer facial muscles.

Greg's avatar

The interesting thing is: the more money or power one achieves, the more honest they are about their views and feelings.

Marlan Hoerer's avatar

Drunk on power as in enough alcohol will reveal true feelings.

Lawsy0's avatar

Nah! In my rarely humble opinion, you can't drink'em pretty.

VICKI's avatar

which reminds me of my years in Georgetown (The River Club) I recall one guy saying "go ugly early" and apparently thought it was pretty funny.

Don Reed's avatar

08/25/25: OH, William, surely you jest. Lizzo in the White House would be an ideal solution to all of our problems. (!)

Steve  C's avatar

I agree. Terrible poll. I am sure there are quality black females in the body politic but why are too smart to get into the mud of politics. They are doing what most Americans with smarts and talent do, they are living their lives and making money.

MLR's avatar

The incompetence and dishonesty exemplified by the black women put in office by the Marxist/Democrat/Hate America Party is not about their race or gender, it’s all about their politics namely Marxism.

Greg's avatar

It's all about race. Conservative white people have been afraid for decades to criticize or even disagree with women or minorities in public life. It was political suicide. So a black woman for mayor is a logical move. The white people would never fight back. Then we (the Marxist left) can manipulate her and do what we want. (Did you notice that the staff around a black mayor used to be all white people? Have you noticed that now it's all black people with really bad attitudes?)

That's over. White libs lost control of their party. They over promised and under-delivered for blacks. Many blacks hate the Republicans - too white They overplayed their hand. Blame this on Obama - the biggest racist in history who ignited a race war they cannot win. Finally, Trump taught us to speak out against this.

Joe LaGreca's avatar

" Finally, Trump taught us to speak out against this." Reminds me of John Connor in the Terminator movie who taught them to fight against the machines.

NNTX's avatar

Check out the CFP headline today about the corrupt Atlantan Stacy Abrams (now deprived of her $2B "grant" from the EPA thanks to Lee Zelda).

She has clearly gone round the bend.

Marlan Hoerer's avatar

Best news since she conceded, oh wait, she hasnt.

Lawsy0's avatar

Check out Biden's interview about his VP pick: https://tinyurl.com/6kfh3wmw

Thankfully, the USA survived that total Biden box of rocks

Grumpy Oldman's avatar

Then why does the the weak, cowardly & timid GOP-e vote for and confirm these DEI, token, quota and affirmative-action nincompoops?

Just Say No, thank you.

James Wills's avatar

I don't dislike black people; I'm just exhausted with them. News flash: nobody these days pays the slightest attention to the Race Card, and people who play it are just inviting ridicule and the Meloni eye-roll. Pull your damn pants up, turn your hat around and just do your job. I don't care in the least what happened 250 years ago; they're all dead.

Kevin C.'s avatar

This reminds me of a recent meme where a police officer pulls over a white, male driver who says, “You can’t give me a ticket, officer. I’m running in a marathon today.”

The cop replies, “That’s not how to play the race card, sir.” 😁

Greg's avatar

True. Yesterday watching the golf match (Yea Tommy?), the last nine holes were "commercial free". They had other purchased "propaganda" from big corporate. All these programs to attract minorities to golf. Hey Accenture! Hey Coke a Cola! SHUT THE EFF UP!!!!! WHO CARES? No one watching that yesterday cares one bit about the race of the player. NO ONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! They just want to see great golf shots. Even the PGA is racist.

NO ONE CARES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

bbox's avatar

I'm way past done. The many of them who hate whites need to leave the country they so hate (along with others with similar feelings). It is just that simple.

Far too many of them in positions of power discriminate against whites and openly say that they do that (it's been in the news multiple times).

Eric Ivers's avatar

Thank you. That is nearly the perfect response. I intend to use it.

Damn the torpedoes's avatar

Don, I couldn’t bring myself to participate in today’s poll. They are all atrocious examples of your great column today, and none is worthy of the White House (even as a first mate). I agree about how they all make it more difficult for good people like Winsome Sears to win office, and help set better examples for future black candidates.

Shrugged's avatar

Speaking of Winsome Sears, truly successful Black women (and men) are rejected by both parties because they 'break the mold' the government has engineered for them (ie. as weak dependents).

Below is an email quote from Winsome Sears' unsuccessful campaign for Governor of Virginia which received may criticisms from both parties.

“Slaves did not die in the fields so that we could call ourselves victims now in 2025,” the email read. “Democrats think minorities can’t succeed without DEI.”

I would vote for this woman today and think Trump should offer her a significant position in his cabinet for ending DEI and promoting merit-based achievement.

Lawsy0's avatar

If ever I get the chance, I will thank Winsome Sears for her service in the USMC! "Oorah!"

James Wills's avatar

When she was running for the office she now holds, Sears campaigned in my town, and I spoke with her one-on-one for about twenty minutes. She's who Virginia must have - certainly not the AWFL (affluent white female liberal) Abigail Spanberger. If A.S. becomes governor, every "gun control" law passed by our communist General Assembly, every DEI mess, every LGBT++ABCDEFG rule will be Virginia Law. You can count on more rapes in high school bathrooms by "female-identifying," intact men. The only thing that has protected us thus far is our Republican governor's veto pen, and if Virginia gets a Democrat governor, we are in deep kimchi.

Lawsy0's avatar

That is such excellent news. Thanks. Besides, no commonwealth nor state in our union need any more woke. We are nearly drowning in it as we speak. Funny how AWFK practically gives the very definition away!

NNTX's avatar

She hasn't lost yet!

We are no longer VA residents, but I would vote for her as many times as legal (:))

Indydoc's avatar

I like Winsome but fear she wont get to move forward

NNTX's avatar

Ditto. First time I did not vote in the poll.

Greg's avatar

I worked for a decade in a majority black organization in DC. I was the token white. I saw real racism first hand. . . And I was the victim. I can tell you, black women are generally not the nicest or smartest people at least in this group. The more authority they got, the meaner they were. Senior black female managers were anxious and racially vindictive.

And you hear this all the time about black women in public life. They're just plain angry. Because they're internally conflicted. They know their truth and they don't like it.

To this day, I still resist pre judging people based on immutable characteristics. It's their actions. And with 6 decades of experience, it's hard not to.

TeaPartyGal's avatar

Exactly, Greg--somewhere deep down inside themselves, many of these artificially promoted women do know they are not qualified. This imposes on them a really wicked psychological dilemna, and it does indeed contribute to an attitude of anger and assertive (i.e., outright brazen) entitlement. They end up living their lives from a standpoint of continual defensiveness (masked as pseudo-confidence).

Joe LaGreca's avatar

I retired in 2022. For the last 10 or so years of my career I was forced to take "diversity" classes (as were all employees) where the white guy in the training videos was always the dumbest guy in the company and minorities (including white women) were the smartest. It was so insulting but the training was required to avoid getting terminated.

darrell's avatar

Yup. Me too. My CEO sent out an email in 2011 to all 25,000 employees stating that everyone's significant other will be covered on our medical insurance. I replied the next day to him that 6 months ago you had our children color pictures to win a spot on the company calendar. The topic was business ethics. I gave him a definition of ethics from a dictionary which defined morality. I told the CEO that he was confusing us down here in the south and asked if he could redo that change on the medical coverage. I shared with my fellow work mates what I was doing and lo and behold two days later the big manager from the big city came and I was called to the head office. He explained to me that the CEO had just lost a son in a costly battle with aids and asked that I not send that email. I replied by saying that if that was true then he should know better than all people why it is wrong. Then I said, "besides its too late, I have already sent it." Do not fear he who can take your life but fear he who can take your life and your soul.

Stephen Wolf's avatar

Just like most commercials on TV. White guy dumber than a rock, can't dress himself w/out help. Woman-Einstein's sister.

dancingtime's avatar

We went through years of sitcoms with that theme...other than Father Knows Best...But, in the old days of TV advertising, the woman on screen sold the product but it was the male voice offscreen who made the closing pitch.

Subvet's avatar

All those sitcoms used "The Honeymooners" for direction. Hanna-Barbara were nearly sued for the "Flintstones".

Subvet's avatar

In 1972 the US Navy required us to go to "Race Relations" forums. I don remember the official name for the things but that's what they were.

dancingtime's avatar

Oh yes...the ones who needed to attend that training were the blacks who would not initiate a salute to officers...especially to women officers....demeaning, they said...also the timeframe of the LSD flashbacks in the fleet...deadly on carriers...race relations? The blacks needed it...and both black and white males needed training on "sorry but women in the squadron are here to stay...get used to it."...and then, of course, it was the Filipinos who could be nothing more than mess cooks...in the age of Ferninand Marcos....no leadership allowed with Filipinos in the Navy...

bbox's avatar

oooohhh, don't even get me started on women (and I am a woman).

You might check out Leonarda Joni's content - she is a stand up comic - hilarious. (no, I don't get $$ from her :) )

Subvet's avatar

Oh yes, I have seen her on videos. She is hilarious. Type her name into a YouTube search you'll get a few of her videos.

Retirednottired's avatar

I once worked for a black female manager, who came in all full of herself and changing things left and right. I had a specific scheduling issue which had been accepted by two prior managers. She came in all bluster, telling me I would work when she told me to work. I told her go ahead and schedule me whatever you want, but I won’t be here on Tuesdays. Shortly thereafter, she called one of our best employees, a black teen who taught Sunday school at his church, “ghetto trash.” He quit and she was fired after only two months in the job. I was proud of my part in that action.

bbox's avatar

I don't think they are internally conflicted at all. They truly believe they deserve everything.

My company had diversity brainwashing; when we all got back from our subgroups from the sessions, it was clear that the whites had been separated from the other colors, and that the non-whites had nothing more than complaint-sessions about whites. Some of them even brought their ridiculous comments to the main meeting. One, who had been with the company for about 13 years or more, talked about how everyday was a constant battle. Every single minute of every day - yet I had previously worked with a number of her co-workers and had no idea what she was talking about.

The bottom line is that they genuinely hate whites. And they hate being around them. The only race that passed protective laws for minorities until parts of the world caught up.

dancingtime's avatar

I have to agree but there is the entitlement concept which was instilled back with Affirmative Action decades ago. They feel entitled.

TeaPartyGal's avatar

I would say that it's more that they hate themselves, or they hate life in general, or resent any in life that disappoints them, and have been TAUGHT to direct all that hatred at whites.

dancingtime's avatar

And...as I answered the 10 year old in the back seat about who the worst drivers are on the road: black women driving Lexus SUVs...bar none...the worst...

Steven W Ham's avatar

Write in vote: Harmeet .. an outstanding woman of color!

Joe LaGreca's avatar

I think DS only listed DEM's in the poll. There are plenty of good choices, but none of them are DEM's - who as a group totally suck.

BlasterJack's avatar

‘Dumber than Joe Biden’ is a low bar!

There’s not much space between his IQ and functionally retarded (~70).

As Rush would say, “Those handles on the steak knives sure are sharp!”🤪

Shrugged's avatar

There is an expanding room at the bottom under Joe Biden, especially if you look at the Dem platform following Biden. It lives in the 20% realm of popularity and I don't think even Biden would have run on all the issues the Dems stand for today.

Stealing a line from 'Young Frankenstein', the Dems of 2025 have brains that came from "Abby-normal".

(Not sure how they spelled that but you get my point if you saw the movie.)

Michael Davis's avatar

It was spelled Abnormal on the jar which Eyegore translated to 'Abbey' with Dr Fronkensteins hands around his neck... Way funny!

Shrugged's avatar

Thanks for clarifying. Eyegore's eyes were too distracting for me to notice the label! I couldn't figure out which one was the good eye.

darrell's avatar

Kinda like A Aron. lol

Lawsy0's avatar

Glad you said that! Back when I wrangled lawyers for a living, one of my fav attorneys would completely crack up laughing at the mere mention of Young Frankenstein.

Shrugged's avatar

DEI started with Affirmative Action Plans (AAP), a result of the Civil Rights laws starting as early as 1961 under JFK and expanding under LBJ in 1965. It was further expanded a few times afterward, and required US firms to write an annual AAP that captured the company's current state of minority representation and the setting of goals for hiring more minorities to meet certain percentages.

Unmet goals became battering rams in later AAP audits.

AAP was legal discrimination, also called reverse discrimination.

Today, it is called DEI, but is still reverse discrimination.

When you throw out pure merit-based rewards for work, you destroy the American Dream.

If the Wright Brothers were minority DEI hires to invent man-powered flight, they'd still be in Kitty Hawk today trying to figure it out.

No's avatar

Reverse implies that one way is the norm. It's just plain discrimination. Marxist terms should never be accepted. I call it Affirmative Racism.

Amy's avatar

Affirmative Racism - that’s exactly what it is.

No's avatar

After fifty plus years of this, the chosen ones believe they earned their positions. We've got Katangwa Jackson, an illiterate idiot, on the Supreme Court and there is no way to get rid of her.

bbox's avatar

And all of the SC judges think she is an idiot - even the non-whites.

No's avatar

Imagine being Clarence Thomas, a man who got to the top when everything was actually against him. A great legal mind, perhaps one of the very best, and here is is sitting next to an imbecile box checker who can't even have the decency to be polite and not constantly prove her stupidity by opening her mouth.

Shrugged's avatar

You are absolutely correct that it is just DISCRIMINATION either way, but I use the term to bring attention to the point that when it is authorized and enforced by our government it is advancing the condition they are trying to stop.

Typical government: causing the problems they claim to be solving.

Suzie's avatar

And It has been entirely intentional.

Shrugged's avatar

Mostly, yes.

I will grant some genuine intention for the earliest work in 1961 under JFK. It was the later legislation (LBJ and Congress) that put in place gargantuan requirements for employers without a shred of instruction for how to practically implement an AAP.

That was magnified many times when the ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) was promulgated under GHW Bush in 1990.

All were 'good ideas' but couldn't be achieved through Government mandate without causing the reverse of the thing they wanted to stop.

Suzie's avatar

The entire concept of Affirmative Action is diabolical!

It literally tagged an entire race as inferior. It is hideous and insulting to say the very least. And most of the country fell for it. Now Look where it’s gotten us: reaping the whirlwind.

Marlan Hoerer's avatar

Exactly the plan Suzie, disruption unending .

bbox's avatar

ADA, another bs program manipulated by undeserving 'employees.'

Retirednottired's avatar

Undeserving may not be the right word here. There are lots of capable handicapped people, but that does not make them suitable for a particular job they may apply for. Wheelchairs, for example, are not suited for jobs requiring climbing or even carrying loads. It is not always easy or even practical to adapt a workplace to accommodate a particular handicap.

Lawsy0's avatar

Amen! "...called DEI, but is still reverse discrimination. "

Wim de Vriend's avatar

I didn't vote, because the list confirmed an observation I made not long ago on this site: black women mayors are the worst kind of officials, combining incompetence, dishonesty and corruption -- all frantically concealed by an oversized mouth. But I failed to add that it's not only at city halls where they suck; as college presidents, as economists, supreme court judges, district attorneys ... not to mention fire chiefs.

Greg's avatar

And the military too.

Wim de Vriend's avatar

Oops, I should have added that Hillary's achievements in the public sector were bad enough to make you think she's secretly black. And if that, by the mysterious, impenetrable logic of the DEI/WOKE crowd, makes me a racist, I'll quote her own self-condemning arrogance: "What difference does it make?"

Douglas Baringer's avatar

I believe it was what difference at this point, does it make. The "at this point" phrase is key to her claiming innocence in the deaths if four Americans. It is like claiming it is ok to run a red light if you made it to your destination unhurt.

Wim de Vriend's avatar

You are absolutely right: It's easy to find, even though it's almost drowning in a torrent of indignant Hillary-shouts, clearly intended to push her malfeasance into the garbage can of history.

Grumpy Oldman's avatar

Can you name one achievement of the Wicked Witch of the East?

Wim de Vriend's avatar

She stayed married to Bill, that horny hound, which is an achievement of sorts -- although I believe that was strictly for self-serving reasons, because she thought he was her ticket to become dictator of these blessed United States. And let's face it, she came dangerously close -- but no cigar, thanks to Trump

Steve (recovering lawyer)'s avatar

I remember the days when white people of European ancestry ran America. Mostly because they were substantially the largest group of people in America, so it was pretty unremarkable. Of course, there were significant collections of blacks sprinkled throughout the country, but mostly clustered in southern states and northern urban enclaves and some from mostly mexican ancestry in the southwest. America did pretty well in those circumstances and although there were exceptions, most people got along fine, even though (or perhaps because) they basically kept to their own particular affinity groups and respected everyone else's right to do so and to be left alone by those outside their group. Then the "civil rights" crowd came along and noticed that white people were running things and they decided that was unfair. So they elevated "fairness" (according to their definition) above everything and every case of "unfairness" became a matter of protest and agitation. Many of those who gravitated to this "civil rights" cadre were, make no mistake, communists and foreign agents provacateur whose goal was not to make America better but rather to destroy it. Like termites, they began their insidious work. As years went by, they ate away more and more of the foundation of the country, always moving the ratchet leftward, no matter what. They took over many of the institutions and subverted them into weapons with which to further their destructive aims; education, the media, business and eventually government on all levels. So here we are. Look around; do you see anywhere an improved America, or has "equality" simply meant an equal measure of misery imposed upon society? Every major city is now beset with crime without punishment and its elected leaders call that "progress." Every educational institution is run by administrators who demand DEI and instructors who were hired because of their "diversity" instead of competence, who indoctrinate students to hate their parents and their country. Businesses are run, not to benefit their customers but to advance ESG. If you think Bud Lite and Cracker Barrel are the only two in question, you have your head in the sand. The wealthy "elites" among us are no longer interested in benefitting those less fortunate, like Carnegie, but only in making certain that nobody can climb up to their level by pulling up the ladder behind them. And much of government on every level has degenerated into a self-licking ice cream cone, where elected officials use their power, not to benefit their electorate, but to enrich themselves, their friends and familiy members. I could go on, but I'll conclude by simply recommending that before you criticize my comments, you take the time to acquaint yourself with the works of Thomas Sowell and Victor Davis Hansen; their observations are both unimpeachable and enlightening. God save America.

Suzie's avatar

I don’t think it was so much that blacks resenting whites as it was white Democrats who seized upon the blacks once again as a commodity, this time no longer as actual slaves, but now to be used as a demographic voting block to claim more power for themselves. They offered them all the “free things”, telling them indirectly they could never make it on their own against the white power structure without Democrat help and hand outs, this time enslaving them to the Democrat Party plantation, and destroying the black family in the process.

The Democrat Party has heaped more misery and destruction upon this country than any war or plague ever could. They are nothing more than a wholly criminal enterprise.

Greg's avatar

I've always said, modern Democrat Party is a fraud. They cannot win in a fair debate and election. They know it. SO, they have been manipulating and cheating for 100 years.

Steve (recovering lawyer)'s avatar

Fair observation about the democrat (communist) party using blacks by offering what amounts to bribes, i.e., affirmative action, DEI, reparations and all the rest. But ask yourself this question: Do bribes work on honest people? Would the democrats have been successful if blacks were not inclined to take the bribes they were offered? I have a great deal of sympathy for honest people of all colors who are tarred with the same brush because of the color of their skin. That's why I mentioned Sowell in my comment; my admiration for him is boundless.

Marlan Hoerer's avatar

Do not forget the rinos Suzie.

Marlan Hoerer's avatar

Perfect dissertation on why we elected PDJT but Hillsdale is a university free of government funding so they specialize in teaching the CONSTITUTION and its meaning.

TeaPartyGal's avatar

It is a real travesty that so many "first" positions in America for blacks have been taken by such incompetent people. It's been more of a mixed bag when it comes to men, as some (mostly the Republican black men), actually deserved it and have done well. (The treasonous Communist, Barack Obama (aka Smarmy Barry), as the first black President is worst of all.) But the Democratic women have been truly horrible.

Instead of bringing a sense of pride and progress to blacks, they have instead brought shame and embarrassment. And astonishingly, have even made white people begin to wonder if there "might be something to" the racist smear that blacks are an inferior race.

I had felt a few twinges of pity for this Lisa Cook when the story first broke, but Don's coverage today of her serial plagiarism demolished that. Yep--fire her.

The Democrats themselves have been demonstrating extreme racism for decades now, as they seem to be convinced blacks cannot compete on an equal ground with whites; therefore you have to lower the competency standards for blacks. If that isn't sheer racism, I don't know what is.

I hope we are getting near to exhausting those wells of white guilt that went along with this.

This was an outstanding column today.

Cookie McCall's avatar

How did Stacey Abrams get left off of this list of incompetent, money grubbing, black women?

Joe LaGreca's avatar

I thought the exact same thing - should have replaced Lizzo, which was my choice.

Greg's avatar

And the fear that these racists in power will take revenge against Europeans akin to South Africa.

Douglas Baringer's avatar

Kinda like that paradigm of goodness Nelson "necklace man" Mandela

Doohmax's avatar

I doubt Trump could’ve been treated any worse in South Africa.

Skinnydip's avatar

And none of them realize they are only reinforcing the stereotype. Sad.

Chuck Goldman's avatar

Socrates said it best.

‘The unexamined life…’

William Robinette's avatar

I would never vote for a person who thinks their best qualification is gender or skin color! If there is a candidate with the intellectual faculties,skillsets, and morals to do the job AND that person happened to be a black woman, I would consider them with others running.

Greg's avatar

To be fair to my other comment, i have met and worked with a few wonderful delightful black women. And I have worked for quite a few white male jerks.

Douglas Baringer's avatar

No Greg, you are equivocating. Call balls and strikes, not maybes, in spite ofs and anyways.

Greg's avatar

You're not one of those white male jerks? LOL

Lawsy0's avatar

Carol Swain is such a person.

Retirednottired's avatar

Winsome Sears seems to fit your requirement.

Retirednottired's avatar

Yes, I know she cannot be president; she is naturalized. But she does fit your requirements, and very well. Smart woman.

Shoveltusker's avatar

"...claiming that she had published an article in the journal American Economic Review. In truth, the article was published in American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, a less prestigious, non-peer-reviewed magazine."

This is a far bigger deal than people outside of academia realize: the difference between peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed publications. I have seen example of this sort of CV padding by people in my academic world. It's a very dishonest dodge.

What Cook claimed to have done is write a paper that was deemed worthy of consideration by AER, a prestigious journal that is very selective (many articles sent to them are rejected). Then, her paper would have been sent out to multiple experts who would provide feedback and make recommendations for or against acceptance. All this would be done "blind", so the identity of the author is not known to the reviewers, and the author does not know who the reviewers are. The process sometimes includes significant re-writes by the author to satisfy issues raised by the reviewers.

What Cook actually did was write a 300-word abstract that described a 15-minute presentation that she wanted to give at the AER-related conference. That abstract was accepted, she gave the presentation, and then submitted a written version of the presentation for the conference proceedings. That paper was not peer-reviewed; whatever she submitted, if it was reasonably coherent, would be included in the proceedings.

My ruling: overt and intentional fraud.

MartyB's avatar

I’m not impressed with many female office holders to begin with. There are a few to be sure, but they’re the exceptions and not the rule. Heck, I’m not sure giving overly emotional critters the right to vote either. That includes soy boys and other liberals too.

Suzie's avatar

I concur. But it’s not even about their sex as much as their respective ideology. And all Lefty women are hands down THE WORST of the worst.

Free Florida Female's avatar

I hate to say it, but I agree. Sigh . . .😢

Steven W Ham's avatar

Oh no, Mr Bill! Now we’re going to have to add bogus patents to the reparations scam!

Lawsy0's avatar

Oh no, Mr. Bill! That's another happy-laugh memory of watching TV with my son when he was a teen ager.