208 Comments
User's avatar
imkitty's avatar

"All We Are Saying, Is Give Me A Job"

What they're really saying is forget the job, just GIVE ME A PAYCHECK.

EODMom's avatar

You do have to wonder how many more small “independent” agencies are out there with similar MO’s. In the scheme of things this was a small fiddle, but not to the perps. To them it was the biggest fiddle of their lives. Reparations, baby, reparations. They deserved it.

Jake's avatar

The rest are housed in NGO's and non profit organizations. Looks like there is more than a small amount of wives and children of judges and politicians employed at these organizations.

WTPuck's avatar

If a so-called NGO is receiving tax money, they are NOT non-governmental.

Robert Brusca's avatar

Farmer John had had an agency

Government funded it-oh!

N..N NGO!

N..N..NGO!

N..N.NGO and

funding was to blame-o!

Jeremy R's avatar

Make that farmer Barry or farmer Zhou. Nice play there., 👍👍

Doug's avatar

DC is a Club and we ain't in it.

PRLJ's avatar

Let's toss it, and all just like it!

Reddog's avatar

And we have been paying them.

Reddog's avatar

An agency with a mission statement and no way to judge their effectiveness or measure results. Who the heck thought that was a good idea?

Valoree Dowell's avatar

Reddog—that pretty much describes most of the Fed bureaucracy. No targets, no results, no one in charge, until now. My personal favorite is the Dept of Education. Half of US fourth and eighth graders don’t read at grade level—by the Dept’s own admission. Time to shut down the feeding trough.

Jeremy R's avatar

I'd bet those numbers were cherry picked and that the other ten grades did far worse.

I'm all for ending public schools and giving parents a voucher instead.

Brian LeMay's avatar

All the DOE was good at was dangling grant money in front of States for favors and kickbacks . Their policy record is proof of their priorities .

imkitty's avatar

Who the heck thought that was a good idea?

Apparently the politicians.

Joseph Kaplan's avatar

The politicians relatives who are unqualified or too lazy to find a job

Jeremy R's avatar

I read that and pictured Hunter.

Brian LeMay's avatar

That is exactly what the left envisioned as it's purpose .

Jeremy R's avatar

Beg to differ, the measure of the results was how much cash was funneled to campaign organizations for communist candidates.

Sancho's avatar

Not being a particularly early riser, you beat me to it. I was about to post...

Hate to correct the boss, but "job" implies work. Their song goes "All we are saying is give us some cash."

Lawsy0's avatar

That's where the saying "good enough for government work" came from. Can I work from home?

Jeremy R's avatar

Years ago two guys I worked with got caught sleeping on the job and fired. A guy who knew the boss called up and inquired about taking one of their positions. He then asked if he could telecommute and just sleep at home.

PRLJ's avatar

Who does POTUS think he is?

Michael Carter's avatar

The duly elected executive, just like every other duly elected President :-)

Jeremy R's avatar

Just don't count Otto Pen in that group.

Dutchmn007's avatar

“Due process”? These fed employees want “due process” to be fired from their jobs? Is this some sort of sick joke? Whatever job you have - fed employee or private sector - you are employed @ the pleasure of your employer who can fire you for any reason @ any time. How perverted has this whole situation become where a regular govt employee thinks they are entitled to their job & can not be fired by anyone - including the Chief Executive? This is a world turned upside down. Not only do these people need - & deserve - to be fired, but they need to be prosecuted for any interference they’re pulling on their end. Examples have to be made of these people. This whole thing has become so warped & misshapen it doesn’t resemble reality anymore. These people inhabit a fantasy world of their own creation.

“Due process”? Missed seeing their demand for that for all those charged in the trumped up J6 BS.

Hypocrisy on full display but then if they didn’t have double standards then they’d have none @ all.

Douglas Baringer's avatar

That is exactly why there should be NO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES UNION! They do not have a right to a "job for life" any more than I do.

Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right.

N.Wallace's avatar

"Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!"

Isaiah 5:20

PRLJ's avatar

I think I'm in the middle (with you) on social issues, or not.

BH's avatar

“These people inhabit a fantasy world of their own creation…” (perfectly stated) and I might add, if I may, that the bureaucratic bloat enabled them to create and believe they were something special.

Accountability was never built in to their reason for existence, like so many of the “essential” alphabet departments and agencies

Reddog's avatar

They don’t think they are entitled to the job, they think they own them. I know plenty of them and one thing stands out; they went to work their so they could retire from the federal government. Fix this by eliminating long term employment. Five years or so and you are out. No lifetime job.

Jeremy R's avatar

Especially for elected and appointed positions.

Jean Mac's avatar

Right, no pension. Pay into SSI like the rest of us. Budget, start an IRA. Be a responsible adult.

Jim Nelson's avatar

This is same "due process" BS the Dems are trying to use to prevent or delay the removal of illegal criminals to El Salvador and elsewhere. Since when does a home invader need due process to be sent packing? Shakespeare was on to something when he wrote about killing all the lawyers.

Sheila Barkofske's avatar

Your comment helped pull me down from the ceiling after reading this post. Sometimes the practical implementation of absurdity gets to be too much. I was watching a couple of PragerU’s 5 minute videos on some of the 20th century’s most heinous people- Stalin, Lenin, Mao, Pol Pot, Castro (Hitler was a piker compared to them) & in every case they (& their god, Marx) all came from a pretty good/decent background. Meaning that their real motivation was not betterment for all but just them. Of course, we all saw what it did to Gollum in the Lord of the Rings.

Kevin Stich's avatar

They got their due process...a pink slip

PRLJ's avatar

Who does POTUS think he is?

Adorable Deplorable's avatar

Quite prescient of these bureaucrats to know a month in advance that they were losing their sugar daddy. Wonder why? LOL.

Jake's avatar

It was pretty obvious but what I can't understand is why didn't they take the buyout?? They chose "poorly".....

Reddog's avatar

Because the so-called buyout came with strings. It would result in a break in service so it affected their pension. It basically was designed to make sure no one could go back to work for the feds if they took it. Smart idea actually if you are truly trying to cut government.

Adorable Deplorable's avatar

Might be reason of all seven deadly sins. Pride, greed, wrath, envy, lust, gluttony, and sloth.

William Coulter's avatar

The more this “resistance “ goes on the more one realizes that much of the federal government operations does not need to be there. Much of it seems to be an employment scam for the well connected.

Reddog's avatar

As I have said countless times, the federal government is a giant partisan jobs program designed to create lifetime voters and an apparatus to ignore elected leaders.

CitizenKate's avatar

And when will the insurrection and treason charges begin? These people need a stiff hand that I am afraid Barbie Pam may not be capable of giving them.

Reddog's avatar

This is a nothing burger. She has far bigger fish to fry. This doesn't rise to criminal and Trump will lose more than he gains if he pursues it. Time for congress to act and codify these cuts. That is the goal, not making people who lost their jobs martyrs.

Playswithneedles's avatar

“The peaceful transition of power once was a hallmark of our country. Thanks to Obama and Biden, it is a distant memory.”

Don’t forget the Clintons. They started the “politics of personal destruction”. Not to mention they and their staffs trashing the White House as they left.

Rich in NC's avatar

The Clintons got the idea from LBJ who used a Mushroom Cloud ad against Goldwater.

Laddie Smith's avatar

At least since

JFK Democrats as a whole simply have overtones of entitlement to power because they are Carriers of the Noble Cause.

In practice that emerges

as “the ends (ours) justify the means”.

Shrugged's avatar

I think some keyboards in DC are still missing the letter ‘W’.

Jeremy R's avatar

And removed the "W" key from all the computers. I remember hearing that one outgoing team removed all the telephone cords in the White House,

Hunterson7's avatar

We don't despise democrats and bureaucrats enough. In less than 90 days since President Trump was inaugurated, democrats are supporting domestic terrorism.

Adorable Deplorable's avatar

Well... they need to support SOMETHING.

Allen McAloney's avatar

I believe the Democrats have been supporting domestic terrorism since 2020, they have now become more blatant in their process.

Jeremy R's avatar

Maybe since 2,000?

No, further, 1860. It's been there MO since the Republican party became a thing.

rural counsel's avatar

When eliminated agencies are being eliminated, or when Doge enters other agencies, they should be accompanied by US Marshalls or special military (like the Little Rock desegregation) to enforce the POTUS's orders. Doors should be breached. The occupants, taken out in handcuffs. Enough of this pussyfooting around with seditious ex-employees.

Douglas Baringer's avatar

It would have been delicious to see the utilities at that building cut off. No water, no gas, no landline phone, no electricity. I think a capitulation would have been inevitable. Breaching doors would have been more fun and would have been a strong FAFO message, but a modern seige is a novel approach.

Jeremy R's avatar

Just pump in a little tear gas.

Wim de Vriend's avatar

You might not even need to breach any doors. Tell the entitled obstructionists that if they're not out of there in 10 minutes, the small military unit waiting outside will start shooting out windows, followed by worse. These people are NOT heroes; they will fold. That's why they got government jobs.

And after the premises are vacated, blow them up. Not only will that encourage "les autres", as the French say, but it will confirm a great Biblical truth: "BLASTED ARE THE PEACEMAKERS".

Reddog's avatar

According to Just the News, they have been accompanied by US Marshalls and other LE.

Jaftosupremis's avatar

These individuals are touching close to treason if not insurrection. If they were in the Military, they would have violated the UCMJ by not following a lawful order. By trying to steal more monies from the American people, they are thieves as well! Jeez. Rack up the charges, bankrupt them and send them to prison. There are openings after Xiadens pardons and all the deportations.

CitizenKate's avatar

Yes!

Reddog's avatar

Notice USIP is supposed to be totally non-partisan yet when they decided to resist they called the NYT to document the event. They didn’t call an independent news media, they called the one far to the left. They could have called the WaPo, or better yet if they wanted a real newspaper, the Washington Times or the Washington Free Beacon. But they didn’t, they called the paper they were the most aligned with. Optics always matter.

Jeremy R's avatar

They should have called the Enquirer.

Cranky Frankie's avatar

DC is already a place where swinging a dead cat virtually guarantees contact with a lawyer. One of the unanticipated benefits of the chain saw approach to do-nothing-agency closures is that there just aren't enough private sector lawyer jobs in DC to absorb those shown the government door.

They'll have to move elsewhere to make a living, thus draining one of the largest problem areas of governance. The belief that any proposed change is assured a relentless litigation opposition discourages any but those on the existing payroll. For once we are seeing an Executive with spine. Hiring the "You're fired!" guy was brilliant!

geraldsd's avatar

We in the hinterland don’t want a single POS lawyer from DC. Keep them, feed them to the pigs…I don’t care, but we don’t want them.

geraldsd's avatar

Actually no, hinterland is used a lot in Geology. My major in College.

Adorable Deplorable's avatar

Did you get that first line from Senator Kennedy? LOL.

Brian LeMay's avatar

Agree , although I am not too sure there are any private sector lawyer jobs in DC .

Bill Carder's avatar

These young people who take your polls are not aware of Captain Kangaroo and Mr. Green Jeans. I'm glad I grew up in the time that I did.

Dan Blackwood's avatar

As much as I wanted to pick Bullwinkle (he’s my hero), I felt no choice but to pick Bun!

Maoz's avatar

Rocky! Rocky the flying squirrel!

Chef R.T.'s avatar

No excitement without indictment.

Fred's avatar

"Ah, the purity of government funding."

Pure gold. But only because Biden turned the USGovernment into his personal piggy bank.

Mona Keegan's avatar

What a circus this is! I know will. I pray we exit the other end with the government we need, efficient and for all the people .

George S. Bardmesser's avatar

Presumably the prosecution of these USIP clowns by the DOJ would take place in DC. What are the odds that a jury in DC will convict? Not very high, sadly... Half of the jurors would themselves be federal employees thinking of ways to obstruct and sabotage Trump...

Reddog's avatar

Total waste of time and money. Trump would lose far more than he gained.

George S. Bardmesser's avatar

I am personally of two minds about this. If the objective is to obtain actual convictions, then it is almost certainly a waste of time and effort. (Waste of money... well, the DOJ is doing this, so, the concept of "money" is somewhat flexible here. "Waste of resources that need to be deployed elsewhere" is probably a better term here.)

But on the other hand there is the lawfare against the Left/Deep State factor here. Call it "counter-lawfare", for lack of a better term. If other bad actors who are actively sabotaging Trump see that there is a significant cost - personal cost - to it, they might think twice about it. So if THAT is the objective, then it might be worth the effort.

In other words, there isn't a simple answer here.

On the whole, I am heartened by the fact that Trump is firing people by the dozen. He clearly learned from his first term.

PRLJ's avatar

See my earlier post, this process is ineffective.

Scott L's avatar

Who in Congress signed off on IP’s annual allotment? Did they receive multi-year funding? If it was only $55M, it must have been approved by the Dems newest page during the start of each new fiscal year. Does Congress have a committee that invents ways to waste money?

Reddog's avatar

Congress exists to “do something”. Thats code for bring back money to your home state, the people who elected you. Can you remember any congressmen who came to DC and spent a career taking money back from the states or trying to save it? Maybe a few come to mind but not many last if they aren’t big dollar members.

Wim de Vriend's avatar

Of course they have such a committee -- though not just one but many. How else do you think the federal government has multiplied like an invasive species?

Jeremy R's avatar

I think the invasive species still outnumber feral employees, but both feed from the same bucket.

Jeremy R's avatar

With the continuing resolutions there has been zero accountability for decades.

NNTX's avatar

There are a number of small agencies and initiatives who were voted in with requirement to "re-up" their authorization to exist.

Naturally Congress is too busy to manage this, just as they can't pass a regular budget, and haven't for years.

The claim is that we have a "divided" congress and that the Republicans have too small an edge. Perhaps true, however if they would FOCUS and use the PEOPLE as their cudgel I suspect it might be different.

A total Cluster.

Hence we needed the resolute, courageous and implacable DJT to make a dent in this mess.